» Articles » PMID: 36217808

International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons Survey of Surgeons' Preference on Rectal Cancer Treatment

Overview
Journal Ann Coloproctol
Date 2022 Oct 11
PMID 36217808
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Rectal cancer treatment has a wide range of possible approaches from radical extirpative surgery to nonoperative watchful waiting following chemoradiotherapy, with or without, additional chemotherapy. Our goal was to assess the personal opinion of active practicing surgeons on rectal cancer treatment if he/she was the patient.

Methods: A panel of the International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ISUCRS) selected 10 questions that were included in a questionnaire that included other items including demographics. The questionnaire was distributed electronically to ISUCRS fellows and other surgeons included in our database and remained open from April 16 to 28, 2020.

Results: One hundred sixty-three specialists completed the survey. The majority of surgeons (n=65, 39.9%) chose the minimally invasive (laparoscopic) surgery for their personal treatment of rectal cancer. For low-lying rectal cancer T1 and T2, the treatment choice was standard chemoradiation+local excision (n=60, 36.8%) followed by local excision±chemoradiotherapy if needed (n=55, 33.7%). In regards to locally advanced low rectal cancer T3 or greater, the preference of the responders was for laparoscopic surgery (n=65, 39.9%). We found a statistically significant relationship between surgeons' age and their preference for minimally invasive techniques demonstrating an age-based bias on senior surgeons' inclination toward open approach.

Conclusion: Our survey reveals an age-based preference by surgeons for minimally invasive surgical techniques as well as organ-preserving techniques for personal treatment of treating rectal cancer. Only 1/4 of specialists do adhere to the international guidelines for treating early rectal cancer.

Citing Articles

Beyond survival: a comprehensive review of quality of life in rectal cancer patients.

Jung W Ann Coloproctol. 2025; 40(6):527-537.

PMID: 39748551 PMC: 11701447. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2024.00745.0106.


Comparative analysis of organ preservation attempt and radical surgery in clinical T2N0 mid to low rectal cancer.

Park H, Lee J, Lee S, Kim C, Kim H Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024; 39(1):136.

PMID: 39164597 PMC: 11335936. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04708-6.


Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes.

Lee C, Park I World J Mens Health. 2024; 42(2):304-320.

PMID: 38449456 PMC: 10949018. DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.230335.


Performance reporting design in artificial intelligence studies using image-based TNM staging and prognostic parameters in rectal cancer: a systematic review.

Kim M, Park T, Oh B, Kim M, Cho B, Son I Ann Coloproctol. 2024; 40(1):13-26.

PMID: 38414120 PMC: 10915525. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2023.00892.0127.


Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration.

Jung K, Kim H, Kim H, Lee D, Cheong C Ann Surg Treat Res. 2023; 105(6):341-352.

PMID: 38076602 PMC: 10703582. DOI: 10.4174/astr.2023.105.6.341.

References
1.
Jiang H, Li Y, Wang B, Wang C, Liu F, Shen Z . Pathological outcomes of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2018; 32(6):2632-2642. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6103-6. View

2.
Paun B, Cassie S, MacLean A, Dixon E, Buie W . Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2010; 251(5):807-18. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181dae4ed. View

3.
Cutting J, Hallam S, Thomas M, Messenger D . A systematic review of local excision followed by adjuvant therapy in early rectal cancer: are pT1 tumours the limit?. Colorectal Dis. 2018; 20(10):854-863. DOI: 10.1111/codi.14340. View

4.
Keller D, Berho M, Perez R, Wexner S, Chand M . The multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 17(7):414-429. DOI: 10.1038/s41575-020-0275-y. View

5.
Eldamshety O, Kotb S, Khater A, Roshdy S, Elashry M, Zahi M . Early and Late Functional Outcomes of Anal Sphincter-Sparing Procedures With Total Mesorectal Excision for Anorectal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Coloproctol. 2020; 36(3):148-154. PMC: 7392569. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2018.07.19. View