Surgeon Perceived Most Important Factors to Achieve the Best Hospital Performance on Colorectal Cancer Surgery: a Dutch Modified Delphi Method

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2019 Sep 26

PMID 31551369

Citations 2

Authors

Julia Tessa van Groningen

Perla J Marang-van de Mheen

Daniel Henneman

Geerard L Beets

Michel W J M Wouters

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: Hospital variation in risk-adjusted outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery has been shown. However, explanatory factors are not sufficiently clear. The objective of this study was to identify factors perceived by gastrointestinal surgeons as important to achieve excellent casemix-adjusted outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery.

Design: Based on literature and experts' opinion, 86 factors associated with serious complications, failure to rescue and mortality were listed. These were presented to gastrointestinal surgeons through two web-based surveys and an expert meeting. Participants were asked to choose their top 10 of most important factors.

Participants: Dutch gastrointestinal surgeons (n=52) of different hospitals and different hospital types (general/teaching/academic).

Results: Of 31 invited experts for the first survey and meeting, 71% responded. Of 130 invited surgeons, 34 responded to the second survey. Factors deemed important were: procedural hospital volume (46% in top 10), specialised surgeons performing surgery, (elective 87%, emergency 60% and reoperations 62% in top 10), accessibility of, and daily ward rounds by specialised surgeons (41% and 38% in top 10), preoperative screening for malnutrition (57% in top 10), a protocol for recognition of anastomotic leakage and rapid reintervention (54% and 49% in top 10).

Conclusion: Procedural hospital volume, specialisation of surgeons, screening for malnutrition, early recognition of complications followed by rapid action were perceived as most important factors to achieve good outcomes by gastrointestinal surgeons.

Citing Articles

International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons' preference on rectal cancer treatment.

Dulskas A, Caushaj P, Grigoravicius D, Zheng L, Fortunato R, Nunoo-Mensah J Ann Coloproctol. 2022; 39(4):307-314.

PMID: 36217808 PMC: 10475796. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2022.00255.0036.

Funnel plots of patient-reported outcomes to evaluate health-care quality: Basic principles, pitfalls and considerations.

van der Willik E, van Zwet E, Hoekstra T, van Ittersum F, Hemmelder M, Zoccali C Nephrology (Carlton). 2020; 26(2):95-104.

PMID: 32725679 PMC: 7891340. DOI: 10.1111/nep.13761.

References

Ghaferi A, Birkmeyer J, Dimick J . Complications, failure to rescue, and mortality with major inpatient surgery in medicare patients. Ann Surg. 2009; 250(6):1029-34. DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181bef697. View

Chioreso C, Del Vecchio N, Schweizer M, Schlichting J, Gribovskaja-Rupp I, Charlton M . Association Between Hospital and Surgeon Volume and Rectal Cancer Surgery Outcomes in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated Since 2000: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018; 61(11):1320-1332. PMC: 7000208. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001198. View

Keenan J, Speicher P, Nussbaum D, Adam M, Miller T, Mantyh C . Improving Outcomes in Colorectal Surgery by Sequential Implementation of Multiple Standardized Care Programs. J Am Coll Surg. 2015; 221(2):404-14.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.04.008. View

Elferink M, Wouters M, Krijnen P, Lemmens V, Jansen-Landheer M, van de Velde C . Disparities in quality of care for colon cancer between hospitals in the Netherlands. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010; 36 Suppl 1:S64-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.05.026. View

Jonker F, Hagemans J, Verhoef C, Burger J . The impact of hospital volume on perioperative outcomes of rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017; 43(10):1894-1900. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.07.009. View

Rowlands C, Griffiths S, Blencowe N, Brown A, Hollowood A, Hornby S . Surgical ward rounds in England: a trainee-led multi-centre study of current practice. Patient Saf Surg. 2014; 8(1):11. PMC: 3996042. DOI: 10.1186/1754-9493-8-11. View

Ghaferi A, Osborne N, Birkmeyer J, Dimick J . Hospital characteristics associated with failure to rescue from complications after pancreatectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 211(3):325-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.04.025. View

Silber J, Rosenbaum P, Schwartz J, Ross R, Williams S . Evaluation of the complication rate as a measure of quality of care in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA. 1995; 274(4):317-23. View

Finks J, Osborne N, Birkmeyer J . Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(22):2128-37. PMC: 3150488. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1010705. View

10.

Dobrow M, Orchard M, Golden B, Holowaty E, Paszat L, Brown A . Response audit of an Internet survey of health care providers and administrators: implications for determination of response rates. J Med Internet Res. 2008; 10(4):e30. PMC: 2629361. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1090. View

11.

Henneman D, Snijders H, Fiocco M, van Leersum N, Kolfschoten N, Wiggers T . Hospital variation in failure to rescue after colorectal cancer surgery: results of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20(7):2117-23. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-2896-7. View

12.

Johnston M, Arora S, King D, Bouras G, Almoudaris A, Davis R . A systematic review to identify the factors that affect failure to rescue and escalation of care in surgery. Surgery. 2015; 157(4):752-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.10.017. View

13.

Johnston M, Arora S, King D, Stroman L, Darzi A . Escalation of care and failure to rescue: a multicenter, multiprofessional qualitative study. Surgery. 2014; 155(6):989-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.01.016. View

14.

Wiebe E, Kaczorowski J, MacKay J . Why are response rates in clinician surveys declining?. Can Fam Physician. 2012; 58(4):e225-8. PMC: 3325475. View

15.

van Groningen J, Eddes E, Fabry H, van Tilburg M, van Nieuwenhoven E, Snel Y . Hospital Teaching Status and Patients' Outcomes After Colon Cancer Surgery. World J Surg. 2018; 42(10):3372-3380. PMC: 6132859. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4580-3. View

16.

Arriaga A, Lancaster R, Berry W, Regenbogen S, Lipsitz S, Kaafarani H . The better colectomy project: association of evidence-based best-practice adherence rates to outcomes in colorectal surgery. Ann Surg. 2009; 250(4):507-13. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b672bc. View

17.

van Leersum N, Snijders H, Henneman D, Kolfschoten N, Gooiker G, Ten Berge M . The Dutch surgical colorectal audit. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013; 39(10):1063-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.05.008. View

18.

Hall G, Shanmugan S, Bleier J, Jeganathan A, Epstein A, Paulson E . Colorectal specialization and survival in colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2015; 18(2):O51-60. DOI: 10.1111/codi.13246. View

19.

Ghaferi A, Birkmeyer J, Dimick J . Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(14):1368-75. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa0903048. View

20.

den Dulk M, Witvliet M, Kortram K, Neijenhuis P, de Hingh I, Engel A . The DULK (Dutch leakage) and modified DULK score compared: actively seek the leak. Colorectal Dis. 2013; 15(9):e528-33. DOI: 10.1111/codi.12379. View