» Articles » PMID: 36196544

Sensory Biases in Response to Novel Complex Acoustic Signals in Male and Female Grey Treefrogs,

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Oct 5
PMID 36196544
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The sensory bias hypothesis proposes that female preferences for male sexual signalling traits evolved in contexts other than mating. Individuals of both sexes may experience similar selection pressures in these contexts; thus males may have similar biases to females for variation in signal traits. We tested this prediction in the grey treefrog, , in which males produce simple advertisement calls, but females are more attracted to certain novel complex stimuli. We recorded males' responses to playbacks of both simple advertisement calls and complex calls consisting of the advertisement call with an acoustic appendage (filtered noise, or heterospecific call pulses) either leading or following the call. We tested females' preferences for the same stimuli in phonotaxis tests. We found evidence for a sensory bias in both sexes: males gave more aggressive calls in response to complex stimuli and females sometimes preferred complex over simple calls. These biases were not universal and depended on both temporal order and appendage characteristics, but how these effects manifested differed between the sexes. Ultimately, our approach of studying biases of both sexes in response to novel mating signals will shed light on the origin of mating preferences, and the mechanisms by which sensory biases operate.

Citing Articles

Sensory biases in response to novel complex acoustic signals in male and female grey treefrogs, .

Reichert M, de la Hera I Proc Biol Sci. 2022; 289(1984):20221306.

PMID: 36196544 PMC: 9532979. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1306.

References
1.
Gerhardt H, Humfeld S, Marshall V . Temporal order and the evolution of complex acoustic signals. Proc Biol Sci. 2007; 274(1619):1789-94. PMC: 2173945. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0451. View

2.
Booker W, Gerhardt H, Lemmon A, Ptacek M, Hassinger A, Schul J . The Complex History of Genome Duplication and Hybridization in North American Gray Treefrogs. Mol Biol Evol. 2021; 39(2). PMC: 8826561. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msab316. View

3.
Gerhardt H . Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems. Evolution. 2005; 59(2):395-408. View

4.
Bernal X, Rand A, Ryan M . Task differences confound sex differences in receiver permissiveness in túngara frogs. Proc Biol Sci. 2009; 276(1660):1323-9. PMC: 2660951. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0935. View

5.
Arnqvist G . Sensory exploitation and sexual conflict. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006; 361(1466):375-86. PMC: 1569614. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1790. View