» Articles » PMID: 36185318

Fate of Engineered Nanomaterials at the Human Epithelial Lung Tissue Barrier After Single and Repeated Exposures

Overview
Journal Front Toxicol
Date 2022 Oct 3
PMID 36185318
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The understanding of the engineered nanomaterials (NMs) potential interaction with tissue barriers is important to predict their accumulation in cells. Herein, the fate, e.g., cellular uptake/adsorption at the cell membrane and translocation, of NMs with different physico-chemical properties across an A549 lung epithelial tissue barrier, cultured on permeable transwell inserts, were evaluated. We assessed the fate of five different NMs, known to be partially soluble, bio-persistent passive and bio-persistent active. Single exposure measurements using 100 µg/ml were performed for barium sulfate (BaSO), cerium dioxide (CeO), titanium dioxide (TiO), and zinc oxide (ZnO) NMs and non-nanosized crystalline silica (DQ). Elemental distribution of the materials in different compartments was measured after 24 and 80 h, e.g., apical, apical wash, intracellular and basal, using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. BaSO, CeO, and TiO were mainly detected in the apical and apical wash fraction, whereas for ZnO a significant fraction was detected in the basal compartment. For DQ the major fraction was found intracellularly. The content in the cellular fraction decreased from 24 to 80 h incubation for all materials. Repeated exposure measurements were performed exposing the cells on four subsequent days to 25 µg/ml. After 80 h BaSO, CeO, and TiO NMs were again mainly detected in the apical fraction, ZnO NMs in the apical and basal fraction, while for DQ a significant concentration was measured in the cell fraction. Interestingly the cellular fraction was in a similar range for both exposure scenarios with one exception, i.e., ZnO NMs, suggesting a potential different behavior for this material under single exposure and repeated exposure conditions. However, we observed for all the NMs, a decrease of the amount detected in the cellular fraction within time, indicating NMs loss by cell division, exocytosis and/or possible dissolution in lysosomes. Overall, the distribution of NMs in the compartments investigated depends on their composition, as for inert and stable NMs the major fraction was detected in the apical and apical wash fraction, whereas for partially soluble NMs apical and basal fractions were almost similar and DQ could mainly be found in the cellular fraction.

Citing Articles

Differentially Induced Autophagy by Engineered Nanomaterial Treatment Has an Impact on Cellular Homeostasis and Cytotoxicity.

Alcolea-Rodriguez V, Dumit V, Ledwith R, Portela R, Banares M, Haase A Nano Lett. 2024; 24(38):11793-11799.

PMID: 39271139 PMC: 11440646. DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c01573.


Method for nanoparticles uptake evaluation based on double labeled fluorescent cells scanned in enhanced darkfield microscopy.

Mihailescu M, Miclea L, Pleava A, Tarba N, Scarlat E, Negoita R Biomed Opt Express. 2023; 14(6):2796-2810.

PMID: 37342715 PMC: 10278607. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.490136.

References
1.
Choi E, Kim S . Surface pH buffering to promote degradation of mesoporous silica nanoparticles under a physiological condition. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2018; 533:463-470. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.08.088. View

2.
Maynard A, Aitken R, Butz T, Colvin V, Donaldson K, Oberdorster G . Safe handling of nanotechnology. Nature. 2006; 444(7117):267-9. DOI: 10.1038/444267a. View

3.
Robock K . Standard quartz dq12 greater than 5 micro m for experimental pneumoconiosis research projects in the Federal Republic of Germany. Ann Occup Hyg. 1973; 16(1):63-6. DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/16.1.63. View

4.
Gwinn M, Vallyathan V . Nanoparticles: health effects--pros and cons. Environ Health Perspect. 2006; 114(12):1818-25. PMC: 1764161. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.8871. View

5.
Gangwal S, Brown J, Wang A, Houck K, Dix D, Kavlock R . Informing selection of nanomaterial concentrations for ToxCast in vitro testing based on occupational exposure potential. Environ Health Perspect. 2011; 119(11):1539-46. PMC: 3226507. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1103750. View