» Articles » PMID: 17185269

Nanoparticles: Health Effects--pros and Cons

Overview
Date 2006 Dec 23
PMID 17185269
Citations 116
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With the advent of nanotechnology, the prospects for using engineered nanomaterials with diameters of < 100 nm in industrial applications, medical imaging, disease diagnoses, drug delivery, cancer treatment, gene therapy, and other areas have progressed rapidly. The potential for nanoparticles (NPs) in these areas is infinite, with novel new applications constantly being explored. The possible toxic health effects of these NPs associated with human exposure are unknown. Many fine particles generally considered "nuisance dusts" are likely to acquire unique surface properties when engineered to nanosize and may exhibit toxic biological effects. Consequently, the nuisance dust may be transported to distant sites and could induce adverse health effects. In addition the beneficial uses of NPs in drug delivery, cancer treatment, and gene therapy may cause unintentional human exposure. Because of our lack of knowledge about the health effects associated with NP exposure, we have an ethical duty to take precautionary measures regarding their use. In this review we highlight the possible toxic human health effects that can result from exposure to ultrafine particles (UFPs) generated by anthropogenic activities and their cardiopulmonary outcomes. The comparability of engineered NPs to UFPs suggests that the human health effects are likely to be similar. Therefore, it is prudent to elucidate their toxicologic effect to minimize occupational and environmental exposure. Highlighting the human health outcomes caused by UFPs is not intended to give a lesser importance to either the unprecedented technologic and industrial rewards of the nanotechnology or their beneficial human uses.

Citing Articles

Nanotechnology for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Liver Cancer.

Cai Y, Wang W, Jiao Q, Hu T, Ren Y, Su X Int J Nanomedicine. 2024; 19:13805-13821.

PMID: 39735328 PMC: 11681781. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S490661.


inhibition of rotavirus multiplication by copper oxide nanoparticles.

Hossieni M, Kiani S, Tavakoli A, Kachooei A, Habib Z, Monavari S Arch Razi Inst. 2024; 79(1):83-91.

PMID: 39192955 PMC: 11345465. DOI: 10.32592/ARI.2024.79.1.83.


Enhanced Antimicrobial Activity of AgCu Nanoparticles: The Role of Particle Size and Alloy Composition.

Le Y, Zhou F, Yang L, Zhu Y, Yang D Molecules. 2024; 29(13).

PMID: 38998976 PMC: 11242933. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29133027.


Recent Advances in Magnesium-Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticle Composites for Biomedical Applications.

Saberi A, Baltatu M, Vizureanu P Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(5).

PMID: 38790374 PMC: 11117911. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11050508.


Roadmap of environmental health research on emerging contaminants: Inspiration from the studies on engineered nanomaterials.

Li X, He F, Wang Z, Xing B Eco Environ Health. 2023; 1(3):181-197.

PMID: 38075596 PMC: 10702922. DOI: 10.1016/j.eehl.2022.10.001.


References
1.
Prahalad A, Soukup J, Inmon J, Willis R, Ghio A, Becker S . Ambient air particles: effects on cellular oxidant radical generation in relation to particulate elemental chemistry. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1999; 158(2):81-91. DOI: 10.1006/taap.1999.8701. View

2.
Lademann J, Weigmann H, Rickmeyer C, BARTHELMES H, Schaefer H, Mueller G . Penetration of titanium dioxide microparticles in a sunscreen formulation into the horny layer and the follicular orifice. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol. 1999; 12(5):247-56. DOI: 10.1159/000066249. View

3.
Peters A, Liu E, Verrier R, Schwartz J, Gold D, Mittleman M . Air pollution and incidence of cardiac arrhythmia. Epidemiology. 2000; 11(1):11-7. DOI: 10.1097/00001648-200001000-00005. View

4.
Samet J, Dominici F, Curriero F, Coursac I, Zeger S . Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 U.S. cities, 1987-1994. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343(24):1742-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200012143432401. View

5.
Oberdorster G . Pulmonary effects of inhaled ultrafine particles. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2001; 74(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1007/s004200000185. View