» Articles » PMID: 36175898

Real-world Data on Breast Pathologic Complete Response and Disease-free Survival After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Hormone Receptor-positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2-negative Breast Cancer: a Multicenter, Retrospective Study In...

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Sep 29
PMID 36175898
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The data in the real-world setting on breast pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HR+, HER2-) breast cancer (BC) is limited. The present study aims to screen for some predictors and investigate the prognostic significance of breast pCR after NAC in HR+, HER2- BC in China.

Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective study. In this study, three hundred eighty-four HR+, HER2- BC patients who received NAC were enrolled between 2010 and 2016 from Shanghai Jiaotong University Breast Cancer Database (SJTU-BCDB). These patients were dichotomized according to the presence of breast pCR after NAC. Logistic analysis was used to screen for predictors associated with breast pCR. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curve and a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis were performed to compare the disease-free survival (DFS) between the two groups. Cox regression was used to analyze the prognostic significance of breast pCR on DFS in HR+, HER2- BC. A nomogram model was established to predict the probability of DFS at 1, 3, and 5 years after NAC.

Results: Fifty-seven patients (14.8%) achieved breast pCR. Univariate analysis showed that tumor size, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Ki67 were associated with breast pCR. Further, multivariate analysis showed that tumor size, PR, and Ki67 remained statistically significant. K-M curves showed a statistical difference between the breast pCR and non-pCR groups before PSM (p = 0.047), and a more significant difference was shown after PSM (p = 0.033). Cox regression after PSM suggested that breast pCR, adjuvant ET, clinical T stage, and Ki67 status were the significant predictive factors for DFS in HR+, HER2- BC patients. The adjusted hazards ratio (aHR) for breast pCR was 0.228 (95% CI, 0.070~0.739; p = 0.014), for adjuvant endocrine therapy was 0.217 (95% CI, 0.059~0.801; p = 0.022), for Ki67 was 1.027 (95% CI, 1.003~1.052; p = 0.027), for cT stages 2 and 3 compared with 1, the values were 1.331 (95% CI, 0.170~10.389), and 4.699 (95% CI, 0.537~41.142), respectively (p = 0.043). A nomogram was built based on these significant predictors, providing an integrated probability of DFS at 1, 3, and 5 years. The values of area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) were 0.967, 0.991, and 0.787, at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years, respectively, demonstrating the ability of the nomogram to predict the DFS.

Conclusions: This real-world study demonstrates that tumor size, PR, and Ki67 were independent predictive factors for breast pCR in HR+, HER2- BC. Breast pCR after NAC was an independent predictor for DFS in HR+, HER2- patients, regardless of a change in nodes. Furthermore, the nomogram built in our study could predict the probability of individualized DFS in HR+, HER2- BC patients.

Citing Articles

Comparing survival outcomes between neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy within hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer among young women (≤35): a retrospective cohort study based on SEER....

Zhao M, Li L, Wang B, Gao S, Wang J, Liu J Am J Cancer Res. 2025; 15(1):390-405.

PMID: 39949935 PMC: 11815373. DOI: 10.62347/EZGV9302.


Development and validation of a nomogram to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in elderly women with triple-negative invasive ductal breast cancer: A SEER population-based study.

Gao Y, Wang J, Wang S, Tao W, Duan R, Hao J Saudi Med J. 2025; 46(1):43-51.

PMID: 39779351 PMC: 11717112. DOI: 10.15537/smj.2025.46.1.20240341.


The Role of the NOLUS Score in Predicting pCR and iDFS in HR-positive HER2-negative Early Breast Cancer Patients who Received Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Amylidi A, Kontovinis L, Douganiotis G, Natsiopoulos I, Papazisis K Cancer Diagn Progn. 2024; 4(6):775-782.

PMID: 39502621 PMC: 11534053. DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10395.

References
1.
Mamtani A, Barrio A, King T, Van Zee K, Plitas G, Pilewskie M . How Often Does Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Avoid Axillary Dissection in Patients With Histologically Confirmed Nodal Metastases? Results of a Prospective Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016; 23(11):3467-3474. PMC: 5070651. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5246-8. View

2.
van Mackelenbergh M, Denkert C, Nekljudova V, Karn T, Schem C, Marme F . Outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-positive and progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer patients: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from ten prospectively randomized controlled neoadjuvant trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017; 167(1):59-71. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4480-5. View

3.
Bonadonna G, Valagussa P, Brambilla C, Ferrari L . Preoperative chemotherapy in operable breast cancer. Lancet. 1993; 341(8858):1485. DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90933-8. View

4.
Rigter L, Loo C, Linn S, Sonke G, van Werkhoven E, Lips E . Neoadjuvant chemotherapy adaptation and serial MRI response monitoring in ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2013; 109(12):2965-72. PMC: 3859944. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.661. View

5.
Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, Mehta K, Costantino J, Wolmark N . Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014; 384(9938):164-72. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62422-8. View