Response-guided Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: We investigated disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after response-guided neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer.
Patients And Methods: We treated 2,072 patients with two cycles of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) and randomly assigned early responders to four (n = 704) or six (n = 686) additional TAC cycles, and early nonresponders to four cycles of TAC (n = 321) or vinorelbine and capecitabine (NX; n = 301) before surgery.
Results: DFS was longer in early responders receiving TAC × 8 than in those receiving TAC × 6 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.97; P = .026), and in early nonresponders receiving TAC-NX than in those receiving TAC × 6 (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.82; P = .001). Exploratory analysis showed that DFS after response-guided chemotherapy (TAC × 8 or TAC-NX) was significantly longer (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.85; P < .003), as was OS (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.99; P = .048), than on conventional chemotherapy (TAC × 6). DFS was longer after response-guided chemotherapy in all hormone receptor-positive tumors (luminal A HR = 0.55, luminal B [human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative] HR = 0.40, and luminal B [HER2 positive] HR = 0.56), but not in hormone receptor-negative tumors (HER2 positive [nonluminal] HR = 1.01 and triple negative HR = 0.87). Pathologic complete response did not predict these survival effects. pCR predicted an improved DFS in triple-negative (HR = 6.67), HER2-positive (nonluminal; HR 5.24), or luminal B (HER2-negative) tumors (HR = 3.74).
Conclusion: This exploratory analysis suggests that response-guided neoadjuvant chemotherapy might improve survival and is most effective in hormone receptor-positive tumors. If confirmed, the response-guided approach could provide a clinically meaningful advantage for the neoadjuvant over the adjuvant approach in early breast cancer.
Gentile D, Canzian J, Barbieri E, Di Maria Grimaldi S, De Sanctis R, Tinterri C Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).
PMID: 40075614 PMC: 11899183. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17050766.
Wang F, Wang Y, Xiong B, Yang Z, Wang J, Yao Y Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2025; 10(1):45.
PMID: 39875376 PMC: 11775149. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-025-02138-6.
Oyekan A, Fatiregun O, Habeebu M, Onyeodi I, Adeoluwa A Ecancermedicalscience. 2025; 18():1791.
PMID: 39816385 PMC: 11735128. DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1791.
Wang X, Zhang Y, Yang M, Wu N, Wang S, Chen H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):31644.
PMID: 39738182 PMC: 11685924. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80409-y.
Miras I, Gil A, Benavent M, Castilla M, Vieites B, Dominguez-Cejudo M Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024; 16:17588359241309169.
PMID: 39734711 PMC: 11672595. DOI: 10.1177/17588359241309169.