» Articles » PMID: 36174551

Validation of a Deep Learning-based Material Estimation Model for Monte Carlo Dose Calculation in Proton Therapy

Overview
Journal Phys Med Biol
Publisher IOP Publishing
Date 2022 Sep 29
PMID 36174551
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

. Computed tomography (CT) to material property conversion dominates proton range uncertainty, impacting the quality of proton treatment planning. Physics-based and machine learning-based methods have been investigated to leverage dual-energy CT (DECT) to predict proton ranges. Recent development includes physics-informed deep learning (DL) for material property inference. This paper aims to develop a framework to validate Monte Carlo dose calculation (MCDC) using CT-based material characterization models.The proposed framework includes two experiments to validatedose and water equivalent thickness (WET) distributions using anthropomorphic and porcine phantoms. Phantoms were irradiated using anteroposterior proton beams, and the exit doses and residual ranges were measured by MatriXX PT and a multi-layer strip ionization chamber. Two pre-trained conventional and physics-informed residual networks (RN/PRN) were used for mass density inference from DECT. Additional two heuristic material conversion models using single-energy CT (SECT) and DECT were implemented for comparisons. The gamma index was used for dose comparisons with criteria of 3%/3 mm (10% dose threshold).. The phantom study showed that MCDC with PRN achieved mean gamma passing rates of 95.9% and 97.8% for the anthropomorphic and porcine phantoms. The rates were 86.0% and 79.7% for MCDC with the empirical DECT model. WET analyses indicated that the mean WET variations between measurement and simulation were -1.66 mm, -2.48 mm, and -0.06 mm for MCDC using a Hounsfield look-up table with SECT and empirical and PRN models with DECT. Validation experiments indicated that MCDC with PRN achieved consistent dose and WET distributions with measurement.. The proposed framework can be used to identify the optimal CT-based material characterization model for MCDC to improve proton range uncertainty. The framework can systematically verify the accuracy of proton treatment planning, and it can potentially be implemented in the treatment room to be instrumental in online adaptive treatment planning.

Citing Articles

Exploration of an adaptive proton therapy strategy using CBCT with the concept of digital twins.

Chang C, Tian Z, Qiu R, McGinnis H, Bohannon D, Bohannon D Phys Med Biol. 2025; 70(2.

PMID: 39761649 PMC: 11740008. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ada684.


MRI-only based material mass density and relative stopping power estimation via deep learning for proton therapy: a preliminary study.

Gao Y, Chang C, Mandava S, Marants R, Scholey J, Goette M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):11166.

PMID: 38750148 PMC: 11096170. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61869-8.


High-resolution MRI synthesis using a data-driven framework with denoising diffusion probabilistic modeling.

Chang C, Peng J, Safari M, Salari E, Pan S, Roper J Phys Med Biol. 2024; 69(4).

PMID: 38241726 PMC: 10839468. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad209c.


Robust explanation supervision for false positive reduction in pulmonary nodule detection.

Zhao Q, Chang C, Yang X, Zhao L Med Phys. 2024; 51(3):1687-1701.

PMID: 38224306 PMC: 10939846. DOI: 10.1002/mp.16937.


Deep learning-based synthetic dose-weighted LET map generation for intensity modulated proton therapy.

Gao Y, Chang C, Pan S, Peng J, Ma C, Patel P Phys Med Biol. 2023; 69(2).

PMID: 38091613 PMC: 10767225. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad154b.


References
1.
Farace P, Righetto R, Meijers A . Pencil beam proton radiography using a multilayer ionization chamber. Phys Med Biol. 2016; 61(11):4078-87. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/11/4078. View

2.
Wohlfahrt P, Mohler C, Enghardt W, Krause M, Kunath D, Menkel S . Refinement of the Hounsfield look-up table by retrospective application of patient-specific direct proton stopping-power prediction from dual-energy CT. Med Phys. 2020; 47(4):1796-1806. DOI: 10.1002/mp.14085. View

3.
Hogstrom K, Mills M, Meyer J, Palta J, Mellenberg D, Meoz R . Dosimetric evaluation of a pencil-beam algorithm for electrons employing a two-dimensional heterogeneity correction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1984; 10(4):561-9. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(84)90036-1. View

4.
. Report of the task group on reference man. Ann ICRP. 2010; 3(1-4):iii. DOI: 10.1016/0146-6453(79)90123-4. View

5.
Low D, Harms W, Mutic S, Purdy J . A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. Med Phys. 1998; 25(5):656-61. DOI: 10.1118/1.598248. View