» Articles » PMID: 36166423

Experimental Natural Transmission (seeder Pig) Models for Reproduction of Swine Dysentery

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 Sep 27
PMID 36166423
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Swine dysentery is causally associated with Brachyspira hampsonii and B. hyodysenteriae infection. Given the importance of transmission models in understanding re-emergent diseases and developing control strategies such as vaccines, the objective of this experiment was to evaluate two experimental natural transmission (seeder pig) models in grower pigs, each with 24 animals. Seeder pigs were intragastrically inoculated using broth cultures of either B. hampsonii strain 30446 (genomovar II) or B. hyodysenteriae strain G44. In trial 1, three seeder pigs were placed into two pens containing nine susceptible contact pigs creating a 1:3 seeder:contact ratio. This was sufficient to achieve natural B. hampsonii infection of 13/18 (72%) contact pigs, however, the incidence of mucoid or mucohemorrhagic diarrhea (MMHD) in contact pigs differed significantly between pens (4/9 versus 9/9; P = 0.03). In trial 2, eight seeder pigs inoculated intragastrically with B. hampsonii did not develop MMHD but when re-inoculated with B. hyodysenteriae 14 days later, all developed mucohemorrhagic diarrhea within 13 days of re-inoculation. Two seeder pigs were placed into each of 4 contact pens each containing 4 pigs. This 1:2 seeder:contact ratio resulted in natural infection of 14/16 (87%) contact pigs with incubation period ranging from 9-15 days. There were no significant differences among pens in incubation period, duration, clinical period or severity of diarrhea. These trials demonstrated that a 1:2 seeder:contact ratio with groups of six grower pigs per pen sustained natural transmission of B. hyodysenteriae G44 with greater consistency in the incidence of MMHD among pens compared to a B. hampsonii 30446 transmission model using 1:3 seeder:contact ratio in pens of 12. Understanding why B. hampsonii intragastric inoculation failed in one experiment warrants additional research.

Citing Articles

Improving the consistency of experimental swine dysentery inoculation strategies.

Parra-Aguirre J, Nosach R, Fernando C, Hill J, Harding J Vet Res. 2023; 54(1):49.

PMID: 37328906 PMC: 10276399. DOI: 10.1186/s13567-023-01180-y.

References
1.
Hampson D, La T, Phillips N . Emergence of species and strains: reinforcing the need for surveillance. Porcine Health Manag. 2017; 1:8. PMC: 5499009. DOI: 10.1186/s40813-015-0002-1. View

2.
Fernie D, Ripley P, Walker P . Swine dysentery: protection against experimental challenge following single dose parenteral immunisation with inactivated Treponema hyodysenteriae. Res Vet Sci. 1983; 35(2):217-21. View

3.
Davies P . One world, one health: the threat of emerging swine diseases. A North American perspective. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2014; 59 Suppl 1:18-26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2012.01312.x. View

4.
Hampson D, La T, Phillips N, Holyoake P . Brachyspira hyodysenteriae isolated from apparently healthy pig herds following an evaluation of a prototype commercial serological ELISA. Vet Microbiol. 2016; 191:15-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.05.016. View

5.
Song Y, Hampson D . Development of a multiplex qPCR for detection and quantitation of pathogenic intestinal spirochaetes in the faeces of pigs and chickens. Vet Microbiol. 2009; 137(1-2):129-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.12.020. View