» Articles » PMID: 36164753

A Scientometrics Analysis and Visualisation of Diabetic Foot Research from 1955 to 2022

Overview
Journal Int Wound J
Date 2022 Sep 27
PMID 36164753
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Diabetic foot (DF) has become a serious health problem in modern society, and it has been a hotspot of research for a long time. However, little scientometric analysis has been carried out on DF. In the present study, we analysed 8633 literature reports on DF in the Web of Science Core Collection from database inception until April 23, 2022. VOSviewer (Centre for Science and Technology Studies at Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands) and CiteSpace (College of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, United States) were employed to address high-impact countries and institutions, journals, references, research hotspots, and key research fields in DF research. Our analysis findings indicated that publications on DF have increased markedly since 2016 and were primarily published in the United States of America. The recent studies focus on the amniotic membrane, foot ulcers, osteomyelitis, and diabetic wound healing. The five keyword clusters, which included DF ulcer and wound healing therapies, management and guidelines, neuropathy and plantar pressure, amputation and ischemia, and DF infection and osteomyelitis, are helpful for enhancing prevention, standardising treatment, avoiding complications, and improving prognosis. These findings indicated a method for future therapies and research in DF.

Citing Articles

Systematic bibliometric and visualized analysis of research hotspots and trends on the application of artificial intelligence in glaucoma from 2013 to 2022.

Liu C, Wang L, Zhu K, Liu C, Duan J Int J Ophthalmol. 2024; 17(9):1731-1742.

PMID: 39296573 PMC: 11367425. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2024.09.22.


How far has diabetes-related foot disease research progressed in Australia? A bibliometric review (1970-2023).

Tehan P, Perrin B, Lazzarini P, Al-Busaidi I, Carroll M J Foot Ankle Res. 2024; 17(2):e12012.

PMID: 38627979 PMC: 11080706. DOI: 10.1002/jfa2.12012.


Advances in stem cells treatment of diabetic wounds: A bibliometric analysis via CiteSpace.

Ma K, Luo C, Du M, Wei Q, Luo Q, Zheng L Skin Res Technol. 2024; 30(4):e13665.

PMID: 38558448 PMC: 10982678. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13665.


State of the art, trends, hotspots, and prospects of injection materials for controlling bleeding.

Feng C, Yang L Int Wound J. 2024; 21(1):e14644.

PMID: 38272794 PMC: 10789653. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14644.


A scientometrics analysis and visualisation of diabetic foot research from 1955 to 2022.

Shen J, Chen J, Feng L, Feng C Int Wound J. 2022; 20(4):1072-1087.

PMID: 36164753 PMC: 10031233. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13964.

References
1.
Malone M, Erasmus A, Schwarzer S, Lau N, Ahmad M, Dickson H . Utilisation of the 2019 IWGDF diabetic foot infection guidelines to benchmark practice and improve the delivery of care in persons with diabetic foot infections. J Foot Ankle Res. 2021; 14(1):10. PMC: 7842064. DOI: 10.1186/s13047-021-00448-w. View

2.
Chen Y, Kuang X, Zhou J, Zhen P, Zeng Z, Lin Z . Proximal Tibial Cortex Transverse Distraction Facilitating Healing and Limb Salvage in Severe and Recalcitrant Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019; 478(4):836-851. PMC: 7282570. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001075. View

3.
Goerlandt F, Li J, Reniers G . The Landscape of Risk Communication Research: A Scientometric Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(9). PMC: 7246897. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17093255. View

4.
Macdonald K, Boeckh S, Stacey H, Jones J . The microbiology of diabetic foot infections: a meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2021; 21(1):770. PMC: 8351150. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06516-7. View

5.
Uckay I, Berli M, Sendi P, Lipsky B . Principles and practice of antibiotic stewardship in the management of diabetic foot infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2019; 32(2):95-101. DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000530. View