» Articles » PMID: 36163634

Integrating F-FDG PET/CT with Lung Dose-volume for Assessing Lung Inflammatory Changes After Arc-based Radiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Pilot Study

Overview
Journal Thorac Cancer
Date 2022 Sep 27
PMID 36163634
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The incidence of radiation pneumonitis (RP) has a highly linear relationship with low-dose lung volume. We previously established a volume-based algorithm (VBA) method to improve low-dose lung volume in radiotherapy (RT). This study assessed lung inflammatory changes by integrating fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( F-FDG PET/CT) with VBA for esophageal cancer patients undergoing arc-based RT.

Methods: Thirty esophageal cancer patients received F-FDG PET/CT imaging pre-RT and post-RT were included in a retrospective pilot study. We fused lung doses and parameters of PET/CT in RT planning. Based on VBA, we used the 5Gy isodose curve to define high-dose (HD) and low-dose (LD) regions in the lung volume. We divided patients into non-RP (nRP) and RP groups. The maximum, mean standardized uptake value (SUVmax, SUVmean), global lung glycolysis (GLG), mean lung dose (MLD) and V in lungs were analyzed. Area under the curve values were utilized to identify optimal cut-off values for RP.

Results: Eleven patients in the nRP group and 19 patients in the RP group were identified. In 30 RP lungs, post-RT SUVmax, SUVmean and GLG of HD regions showed significant increases compared to values for pre-RT lungs. There were no significant differences in values of 22 nRP lungs. Post-RT SUVmax and SUVmean of HD regions, MLD, and lung V and V in RP lungs were significantly higher than in nRP lungs. For detecting RP, the optimal cut-off values were post-RT SUVmax > 2.28 and lung V  > 47.14%.

Conclusion: This study successfully integrated F-FDG PET/CT with VBA to assess RP in esophageal cancer patients undergoing RT. Post-RT SUVmax > 2.28 and lung V  > 47.14% might be potential indicators of RP.

Citing Articles

Combined modality therapy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Radiation dose and survival analyses.

Shueng P, Huang C, Liu Y, Wu Y, Huang P, Yen S Thorac Cancer. 2022; 14(2):143-148.

PMID: 36351568 PMC: 9834687. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14724.


Comments on "dynamic F-FDG PET/CT can predict the major pathological response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer".

Wang S, Shiau Y, Hsu C Thorac Cancer. 2022; 13(24):3513-3514.

PMID: 36288468 PMC: 9750810. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14710.


Integrating F-FDG PET/CT with lung dose-volume for assessing lung inflammatory changes after arc-based radiotherapy for esophageal cancer: A pilot study.

Hsu C, Lin K, Shueng P, Wu Y, Tsai W, Chang C Thorac Cancer. 2022; 13(22):3114-3123.

PMID: 36163634 PMC: 9663684. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14661.

References
1.
Jo I, Kay C, Kim J, Son S, Kang Y, Jung J . Significance of low-dose radiation distribution in development of radiation pneumonitis after helical-tomotherapy-based hypofractionated radiotherapy for pulmonary metastases. J Radiat Res. 2013; 55(1):105-12. PMC: 3885113. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrt080. View

2.
GRAHAM M, Purdy J, Emami B, Harms W, Bosch W, Lockett M . Clinical dose-volume histogram analysis for pneumonitis after 3D treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999; 45(2):323-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00183-2. View

3.
Jain V, Berman A . Radiation Pneumonitis: Old Problem, New Tricks. Cancers (Basel). 2018; 10(7). PMC: 6071030. DOI: 10.3390/cancers10070222. View

4.
Libshitz H, SOUTHARD M . Complications of radiation therapy: the thorax. Semin Roentgenol. 1974; 9(1):41-9. DOI: 10.1016/0037-198x(74)90008-x. View

5.
Jahangiri P, Pournazari K, Torigian D, Werner T, Swisher-McClure S, Simone 2nd C . A prospective study of the feasibility of FDG-PET/CT imaging to quantify radiation-induced lung inflammation in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving proton or photon radiotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018; 46(1):206-216. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4154-5. View