» Articles » PMID: 36158618

Multimodal Resting-state Connectivity Predicts Affective Neurofeedback Performance

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 Sep 26
PMID 36158618
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Neurofeedback has been suggested as a potential complementary therapy to different psychiatric disorders. Of interest for this approach is the prediction of individual performance and outcomes. In this study, we applied functional connectivity-based modeling using electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) modalities to (i) investigate whether resting-state connectivity predicts performance during an affective neurofeedback task and (ii) evaluate the extent to which predictive connectivity profiles are correlated across EEG and fNIRS techniques. The fNIRS oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin concentrations and the EEG beta and gamma bands modulated by the alpha frequency band (beta--alpha and gamma--alpha, respectively) recorded over the frontal cortex of healthy subjects were used to estimate functional connectivity from each neuroimaging modality. For each connectivity matrix, relevant edges were selected in a leave-one-subject-out procedure, summed into "connectivity summary scores" (CSS), and submitted as inputs to a support vector regressor (SVR). Then, the performance of the left-out-subject was predicted using the trained SVR model. Linear relationships between the CSS across both modalities were evaluated using Pearson's correlation. The predictive model showed a mean absolute error smaller than 20%, and the fNIRS oxyhemoglobin CSS was significantly correlated with the EEG gamma--alpha CSS ( = -0.456, = 0.030). These results support that pre-task electrophysiological and hemodynamic resting-state connectivity are potential predictors of neurofeedback performance and are meaningfully coupled. This investigation motivates the use of joint EEG-fNIRS connectivity as outcome predictors, as well as a tool for functional connectivity coupling investigation.

Citing Articles

From lab to life: challenges and perspectives of fNIRS for haemodynamic-based neurofeedback in real-world environments.

Klein F, Kohl S, Luhrs M, Mehler D, Sorger B Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1915):20230087.

PMID: 39428887 PMC: 11513164. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0087.


Assessing the Effectiveness of Audio-Visual vs. Visual Neurofeedback for Attention Enhancement: A Pilot Study with Neurological, Behavioural, and Neuropsychological Measures.

Ejaz O, Hasan M, Raees F, Hammad M, Qazi S Brain Topogr. 2024; 38(1):7.

PMID: 39397132 DOI: 10.1007/s10548-024-01076-w.

References
1.
Lindquist K, Wager T, Kober H, Bliss-Moreau E, Barrett L . The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review. Behav Brain Sci. 2012; 35(3):121-43. PMC: 4329228. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X11000446. View

2.
Laufs H, Kleinschmidt A, Beyerle A, Eger E, Salek-Haddadi A, Preibisch C . EEG-correlated fMRI of human alpha activity. Neuroimage. 2003; 19(4):1463-76. DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00286-6. View

3.
Mantini D, Perrucci M, Del Gratta C, Romani G, Corbetta M . Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(32):13170-5. PMC: 1941820. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0700668104. View

4.
Doi H, Nishitani S, Shinohara K . NIRS as a tool for assaying emotional function in the prefrontal cortex. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7:770. PMC: 3831266. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00770. View

5.
Sitaram R, Ros T, Stoeckel L, Haller S, Scharnowski F, Lewis-Peacock J . Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016; 18(2):86-100. DOI: 10.1038/nrn.2016.164. View