» Articles » PMID: 36157537

Endoscopic Salvage Therapy After Failed Biliary Cannulation Using Advanced Techniques: A Concise Review

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2022 Sep 26
PMID 36157537
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) begins with successful biliary cannulation. However, it is not always be successful. The failure of the initial ERCP is attributed to two main aspects: the papilla/biliary orifice is endoscopically accessible, or it is inaccessible. When the papilla/biliary orifice is accessible, bile duct cannulation failure can occur even with advanced cannulation techniques, including double guidewire techniques, transpancreatic sphincterotomy, needle-knife precut papillotomy, or fistulotomy. There is currently no consensus on the next steps of treatment in this setting. Therefore, this review aims to propose and discuss potential endoscopic options for patients who have failed ERCP due to difficult bile duct cannulation. These options include interval ERCP, percutaneous-transhepatic-endoscopic rendezvous procedures (PTE-RV), and endoscopic ultrasound-assisted rendezvous procedures (EUS-RV). The overall success rate for interval ERCP was 76.3% (68%-79% between studies), and the overall adverse event rate was 7.5% (0-15.9% between studies). The overall success rate for PTE-RV was 88.7% (80.4%-100% between studies), and the overall adverse event rate was 13.2% (4.9%-19.2% between studies). For EUS-RV, the overall success rate was 82%-86.1%, and the overall adverse event rate was 13%-15.6%. Because interval ERCP has an acceptably high success rate and lower adverse event rate and does not require additional expertise, facilities, or other specialists, it can be considered the first choice for salvage therapy. EUS-RV can also be considered if local experts are available. For patients in urgent need of biliary drainage, PTE-RV should be considered.

Citing Articles

Pancreatic stent improves the success rate of needle-knife papillotomy in patients with difficult biliary cannulation.

Lee M, Lin C, Wu C, Tsou Y, Sung K, Wang S World J Gastroenterol. 2025; 31(1):97240.

PMID: 39777249 PMC: 11684180. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i1.97240.


Large balloon sphincteroplasty for CBD stone removal during acute cholangitis. Single center propensity-score matched cohort study.

Ho Yin Henry L, Wai Yin Angus C, Chi Chuen Clarence M, Yiu Fung A, Ning F, Ka Wing Keith L Surg Endosc. 2024; 39(2):1077-1085.

PMID: 39690334 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11402-9.


Impact of Duodenal Papilla Morphology on the Success of Transpancreatic Precut Sphincterotomy.

Chen Y, Liao Y, Peng Y, Tung C, Tsai H, Yang S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(22).

PMID: 39598086 PMC: 11594982. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13226940.


Acute cholangitis: Does malignant biliary obstruction choledocholithiasis etiology change the clinical presentation and outcomes?.

Tsou Y, Su Y, Lin C, Liu N World J Clin Cases. 2023; 11(29):6984-6994.

PMID: 37946763 PMC: 10631399. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i29.6984.

References
1.
Yoon W, Brugge W . EUS-guided biliary rendezvous: EUS to the rescue. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75(2):360-1. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.024. View

2.
Tang Z, Igbinomwanhia E, Elhanafi S, Othman M . Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Rendezvous Drainage of Biliary Obstruction Using a New Flexible 19-Gauge Fine Needle Aspiration Needle. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2016; 2016:3125962. PMC: 5086367. DOI: 10.1155/2016/3125962. View

3.
Ogura T, Higuchi K . Technical Review of Developments in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy. Clin Endosc. 2021; 54(5):651-659. PMC: 8505184. DOI: 10.5946/ce.2021.020-KDDW. View

4.
Martinez B, Martinez J, Casellas J, Aparicio J . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous in benign biliary or pancreatic disorders with a 22-gauge needle and a 0.018-inch guidewire. Endosc Int Open. 2019; 7(8):E1038-E1043. PMC: 6687477. DOI: 10.1055/a-0918-5931. View

5.
Reddy D, Nabi Z, Lakhtakia S . How to Improve Cannulation Rates During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology. 2017; 152(6):1275-1279. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.03.041. View