» Articles » PMID: 30866611

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage for Benign Biliary Diseases

Overview
Journal Clin Endosc
Date 2019 Mar 15
PMID 30866611
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the first-line treatment for benign biliary diseases, this procedure is technically difficult in some conditions such as a surgically altered anatomy and gastric outlet obstruction. After a failed ERCP, a surgical or a percutaneous approach is selected as a rescue procedure; however, various endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided interventions are increasingly utilized in pancreatobiliary diseases, including EUS-guided rendezvous for failed biliary cannulation, EUS-guided antegrade treatment for stone management, and EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy for anastomotic strictures in patients with a surgically altered anatomy. There are some technical hurdles in EUS-guided interventions for benign biliary diseases owing to the difficulty in puncturing a relatively small bile duct and in subsequent guidewire manipulation, as well as the lack of dedicated devices. A recent major advancement in this field is the introduction of a 2-step approach, in which EUS-guided drainage is placed in the first session and antegrade treatment is performed in subsequent sessions. This approach allows the use of various techniques such as mechanical lithotripsy and cholangioscopy without a risk of bile leak. In summary, EUS-guided interventions are among the treatment options for benign biliary diseases; however, standardization of the procedure and development of a treatment algorithm are needed.

Citing Articles

Successful reinterventional drainage via endoscopic ultrasound-guided cannulation with anastomotic identification.

Namima D, Fujisawa T, Takasaki Y, Tomishima K, Ishii S, Kobara H Endoscopy. 2025; 57(S 01):E159-E160.

PMID: 39933750 PMC: 11813656. DOI: 10.1055/a-2505-9500.


EUS-BD for calibration of benign stenosis of the bile duct in patients with altered anatomy or inaccessible papilla.

Caillol F, Godat S, Solovyev A, Harouchi A, Oumrani S, Marx M Endosc Int Open. 2024; 12(3):E377-E384.

PMID: 38464978 PMC: 10919993. DOI: 10.1055/a-2261-2968.


Current paradigm of endoscopic ultrasound in biliary and pancreatic duct drainage: an update.

Jearth V, Sundaram S, Kale A, Sachan A, Rana S Ann Gastroenterol. 2024; 37(1):1-14.

PMID: 38223246 PMC: 10785026. DOI: 10.20524/aog.2023.0854.


Endoscopic Biliary Drainage in Surgically Altered Anatomy.

Spadaccini M, Giacchetto C, Fiacca M, Colombo M, Andreozzi M, Carrara S Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(24).

PMID: 38132207 PMC: 10742737. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13243623.


Safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy in patients with malignant biliary obstruction and ascites.

Yasuda T, Hara K, Mizuno N, Haba S, Kuwahara T, Okuno N Clin Endosc. 2023; 57(2):246-252.

PMID: 37743069 PMC: 10984745. DOI: 10.5946/ce.2023.075.


References
1.
Moon J, Cho Y, Ryu C, Kim J, Cho J, Kim Y . The role of percutaneous transhepatic papillary balloon dilation in percutaneous choledochoscopic lithotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 54(2):232-6. DOI: 10.1067/mge.2001.116881. View

2.
Giovannini M, Moutardier V, Pesenti C, Bories E, Lelong B, Delpero J . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided bilioduodenal anastomosis: a new technique for biliary drainage. Endoscopy. 2001; 33(10):898-900. DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-17324. View

3.
Vilmann P, Jacobsen G, Henriksen F, Hancke S . Endoscopic ultrasonography with guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in pancreatic disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992; 38(2):172-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(92)70385-x. View

4.
Weilert F, Binmoeller K, Marson F, Bhat Y, Shah J . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided anterograde treatment of biliary stones following gastric bypass. Endoscopy. 2011; 43(12):1105-8. DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256961. View

5.
Iwashita T, Lee J, Shinoura S, Nakai Y, Park D, Muthusamy V . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous for biliary access after failed cannulation. Endoscopy. 2011; 44(1):60-5. DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256871. View