» Articles » PMID: 36144483

Comparison of Two Bovine Commercial Xenografts in the Regeneration of Critical Cranial Defects

Overview
Journal Molecules
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Sep 23
PMID 36144483
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Autologous bone is the gold standard in regeneration processes. However, there is an endless search for alternative materials in bone regeneration. Xenografts can act as bone substitutes given the difficulty of obtaining bone tissue from patients and before the limitations in the availability of homologous tissue donors. Bone neoformation was studied in critical-size defects created in the parietal bone of 40 adult male Wistar rats, implanted with xenografts composed of particulate bovine hydroxyapatite (HA) and with blocks of bovine hydroxyapatite (HA) and Collagen, which introduces crystallinity to the materials. The Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis demonstrated the carbonate and phosphate groups of the hydroxyapatite and the amide groups of the collagen structure, while the thermal transitions for HA and HA/collagen composites established mainly dehydration endothermal processes, which increased (from 79 °C to 83 °C) for F2 due to the collagen presence. The xenograft's X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) analysis also revealed the bovine HA crystalline structure, with a prominent peak centered at 32°. We observed macroporosity and mesoporosity in the xenografts from the morphology studies with heterogeneous distribution. The two xenografts induced neoformation in defects of critical size. Histological, histochemical, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses were performed 30, 60, and 90 days after implantation. The empty defects showed signs of neoformation lower than 30% in the three periods, while the defects implanted with the material showed partial regeneration. InterOss Collagen material temporarily induced osteon formation during the healing process. The results presented here are promising for bone regeneration, demonstrating a beneficial impact in the biomedical field.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Two Anorganic Bovine Xenogenous Grafts in Bone Healing of Critical Defect in Rats Calvaria.

Garcia V, Dall Agnol G, Campista C, Bury L, Ervolino E, Longo M Braz Dent J. 2024; 35:e246119.

PMID: 39476115 PMC: 11506241. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440202406119.


Tomographic and Electron Microscopy Description of Two Bone-Substitute Xenografts for the Preservation of Dental Alveoli.

Barba-Rosado L, Realpe M, Valencia-Llano C, Lopez-Tenorio D, Pineres-Ariza I, Grande-Tovar C Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(20).

PMID: 39456723 PMC: 11507575. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252010942.


Graphene Oxide Nanosheets for Bone Tissue Regeneration.

Castro J, Payan-Valero A, Valencia-Llano C, Valencia Zapata M, Mina Hernandez J, Zapata P Molecules. 2024; 29(14).

PMID: 39064841 PMC: 11279378. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29143263.


Comparing the effects of BoneB® xenograft and InterOss® xenograft bone material on rabbit calvaria bone defect regeneration.

Naini A, Kobravi S, Jafari A, Lotfalizadeh M, Lotfalizadeh N, Farhadi S Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024; 10(3):e875.

PMID: 38798121 PMC: 11128774. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.875.


A Comparative Study of HA/DBM Compounds Derived from Bovine and Porcine for Bone Regeneration.

Roldan L, Isaza C, Ospina J, Montoya C, Dominguez J, Orrego S J Funct Biomater. 2023; 14(9).

PMID: 37754853 PMC: 10532284. DOI: 10.3390/jfb14090439.


References
1.
Shaheen M, Basudan A, Niazy A, van den Beucken J, Jansen J, Alghamdi H . Histological and Histomorphometric Analyses of Bone Regeneration in Osteoporotic Rats Using a Xenograft Material. Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(1). PMC: 7795077. DOI: 10.3390/ma14010222. View

2.
Chatzipetros E, Yfanti Z, Christopoulos P, Donta C, Damaskos S, Tsiambas E . Imaging of nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan scaffolds using a cone beam computed tomography device on rat calvarial defects with histological verification. Clin Oral Investig. 2019; 24(1):437-446. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-02939-4. View

3.
Ryan A, Gleeson J, Matsiko A, Thompson E, OBrien F . Effect of different hydroxyapatite incorporation methods on the structural and biological properties of porous collagen scaffolds for bone repair. J Anat. 2014; 227(6):732-45. PMC: 4694123. DOI: 10.1111/joa.12262. View

4.
Zhang S, Li X, Qi Y, Ma X, Qiao S, Cai H . Comparison of Autogenous Tooth Materials and Other Bone Grafts. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2021; 18(3):327-341. PMC: 8169722. DOI: 10.1007/s13770-021-00333-4. View

5.
Kim D, Hong H, Lin J, Nevins M . Evaluation of the Bone-Regenerating Effects of Two Anorganic Bovine Bone Grafts in a Critical-Sized Alveolar Ridge Defect Model. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017; 37(4):e234-e244. DOI: 10.11607/prd.3305. View