» Articles » PMID: 36142778

Effects of Various Disinfection Methods on the Material Properties of Silicone Dental Impressions of Different Types and Viscosities

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Sep 23
PMID 36142778
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is an ongoing search for novel disinfection techniques that are not only effective, cheap, and convenient, but that also do not have adverse effects on the properties of dental impressions. We compared the effects of various methods (UVC, gaseous ozone, commercial solution, and spray) on the dimensional change, tensile strength, and hardness of silicone impressions. Moreover, as a secondary aim, we performed a statistical comparison of the properties of nondisinfected addition (Panasil Putty Soft, Panasil monophase Medium, Panasil initial contact Light) and condensation silicones (Zetaplus Putty and Oranwash L), as well as a comparison of materials of various viscosities (putty, medium-bodied, and light-bodied). Our results revealed that addition silicones had higher dimensional stability, tensile strength, and Shore A hardness compared to condensation silicones. Both traditional (immersion and spraying) and alternative methods of disinfection (UVC and ozone) had no significant impact on the tensile properties and dimensional stability of the studied silicones; however, they significantly affected the hardness, particularly of Oranwash L. Our study demonstrated that, similarly to standard liquid disinfectants, both UVC and ozone do not strongly affect the material properties of most silicones. However, before recommendation, their usefulness for each individual material should be thoroughly evaluated.

Citing Articles

Effect of Ultraviolet C light disinfection on the dimensional stability of dental impression materials: A scoping review of the literature.

Malpartida-Carrillo V, Tinedo-Lopez P, Salas-Quispe J, Fry-Oropeza M, Amaya-Pajares S, Ozcan M J Clin Exp Dent. 2024; 16(11):e1422-e1428.

PMID: 39670026 PMC: 11632725. DOI: 10.4317/jced.62119.


Study on the effect of chlorogenic acid on the antimicrobial effect, physical properties and model accuracy of alginate impression materials.

Jiang S, Chen F, Hu Q, Yang F, Hu N, Luo X PeerJ. 2024; 12:e18228.

PMID: 39494305 PMC: 11531742. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18228.


Comparative Evaluation of Disinfection Protocols for Dental Impressions in Prosthodontics.

Sonkesriya S, Gaur G, Maheshwari A, Kumar Ashahiya A, Kaur Aulakh S, Kumar A Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e65535.

PMID: 39188490 PMC: 11346668. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65535.


The Pterygomandibular Space: A Volumetric Evaluation Using the Novel A-Silicone Injections Method.

Darawsheh H, Alsaegh A, Kanukoeva E, Saleev R, Saleeva G, Volel B Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 38893688 PMC: 11172122. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14111161.


Assessment of dimensional stability of novel VPES impression material at different time intervals with standard disinfectants.

Ahuja B, Pawashe K, Sanyal P, A Al-Qarni M, Alqahtani N, Alqahtani S BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):579.

PMID: 38762747 PMC: 11102608. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04323-5.


References
1.
Aeran H, Sharma S, Kumar V, Gupta N . Use of Clinical UV Chamber to Disinfect Dental Impressions: A Comparative Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9(8):ZC67-70. PMC: 4576645. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14025.6353. View

2.
Kustrzycka D, Marschang T, Mikulewicz M, Grzebieluch W . Comparison of the Accuracy of 3D Images Obtained fromDifferent Types of Scanners: A Systematic Review. J Healthc Eng. 2021; 2020:8854204. PMC: 7752290. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8854204. View

3.
Poulis N, Prombonas A, Yannikakis S, Karampotsos T, Katsarou M, Drakoulis N . Preliminary SEM Observations on the Surface of Elastomeric Impression Materials after Immersion or Ozone Disinfection. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017; 10(12):ZC01-ZC05. PMC: 5296566. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20330.8949. View

4.
Ahlholm P, Sipila K, Vallittu P, Jakonen M, Kotiranta U . Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review. J Prosthodont. 2016; 27(1):35-41. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12527. View

5.
Cicciu M, Fiorillo L, DAmico C, Gambino D, Amantia E, Laino L . 3D Digital Impression Systems Compared with Traditional Techniques in Dentistry: A Recent Data Systematic Review. Materials (Basel). 2020; 13(8). PMC: 7215909. DOI: 10.3390/ma13081982. View