» Articles » PMID: 36130089

Predictive Coding Across the Left Fronto-temporal Hierarchy During Language Comprehension

Overview
Journal Cereb Cortex
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 Sep 21
PMID 36130089
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We used magnetoencephalography (MEG) and event-related potentials (ERPs) to track the time-course and localization of evoked activity produced by expected, unexpected plausible, and implausible words during incremental language comprehension. We suggest that the full pattern of results can be explained within a hierarchical predictive coding framework in which increased evoked activity reflects the activation of residual information that was not already represented at a given level of the fronto-temporal hierarchy ("error" activity). Between 300 and 500 ms, the three conditions produced progressively larger responses within left temporal cortex (lexico-semantic prediction error), whereas implausible inputs produced a selectively enhanced response within inferior frontal cortex (prediction error at the level of the event model). Between 600 and 1,000 ms, unexpected plausible words activated left inferior frontal and middle temporal cortices (feedback activity that produced top-down error), whereas highly implausible inputs activated left inferior frontal cortex, posterior fusiform (unsuppressed orthographic prediction error/reprocessing), and medial temporal cortex (possibly supporting new learning). Therefore, predictive coding may provide a unifying theory that links language comprehension to other domains of cognition.

Citing Articles

An implemented predictive coding model of lexico-semantic processing explains the dynamics of univariate and multivariate activity within the left ventromedial temporal lobe during reading comprehension.

Wang L, Nour Eddine S, Brothers T, Jensen O, Kuperberg G Neuroimage. 2024; 308:120977.

PMID: 39694345 PMC: 11894502. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120977.


Temporal attention amplifies stimulus information in fronto-cingulate cortex at an intermediate processing stage.

Zhu J, Tian K, Carrasco M, Denison R PNAS Nexus. 2024; 3(12):pgae535.

PMID: 39660067 PMC: 11631134. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae535.


Better Together: Integrating Multivariate with Univariate Methods, and MEG with EEG to Study Language Comprehension.

Wang L, Kuperberg G Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2024; 39(8):991-1019.

PMID: 39444757 PMC: 11495849. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2023.2223783.


Neural semantic effects of tone accents.

Kwon J, Roll M Neuroreport. 2024; 35(13):868-872.

PMID: 39101373 PMC: 11323759. DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000002077.


Predictive Processing During Cue-Outcome Associative Learning in Autistic Children.

Papastamou F, Dumont C, Destrebecqz A, Kissine M J Autism Dev Disord. 2024; .

PMID: 38951312 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-024-06448-6.


References
1.
Khan S, Hashmi J, Mamashli F, Michmizos K, Kitzbichler M, Bharadwaj H . Maturation trajectories of cortical resting-state networks depend on the mediating frequency band. Neuroimage. 2018; 174:57-68. PMC: 5949275. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.018. View

2.
Sohoglu E, Davis M . Rapid computations of spectrotemporal prediction error support perception of degraded speech. Elife. 2020; 9. PMC: 7641582. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.58077. View

3.
Kuperberg G, Sitnikova T, Caplan D, Holcomb P . Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003; 17(1):117-29. DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00086-7. View

4.
Clark A . Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behav Brain Sci. 2013; 36(3):181-204. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12000477. View

5.
Nobre A, McCarthy G . Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: II. Effects of word type and semantic priming. J Neurosci. 1995; 15(2):1090-8. PMC: 6577813. View