» Articles » PMID: 36127519

Evaluation of a New CT-Guided Robotic System for Percutaneous Needle Insertion for Thermal Ablation of Liver Tumors: A Prospective Pilot Study

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To assess the feasibility and safety of a robotic system for percutaneous needle insertion during thermal ablation of liver tumors.

Materials And Methods: This study analyzed the CT-guided percutaneous needle insertion using the EPIONE robotic device (Quantum Surgical, Montpellier, France) for radiofrequency or microwave liver ablation. The main criteria of the study were feasibility (possibility to perform the thermal ablation after needle insertion), the number of needle adjustments (reiteration of robotically assisted needle insertion when initial needle positioning is considered insufficient to perform ablation), and robotic-guided procedure safety (complications related to the needle insertion). Patients were followed up at 6 months post-intervention to assess local tumor control.

Results: Twenty-one patients with 24 tumors, including 6 HCC and 18 metastases measuring 15.6 ± 7.2 mm, were enrolled. One patient (with one tumor) was excluded for protocol deviation. Robotic assisted thermal ablation was feasible for 22/23 lesions (95.7%) and 19/20 patients (95.0%), as validated by a data safety monitoring Board (95% CI [76.39%; 99.11%]) for the per-protocol population. The mean number of needle adjustments per tumor treated was 0.4 (SD: 0.7), with 70.8% of tumors requiring no adjustment. No adverse events were depicted. Rate of local tumor control was 83.3% for patients and 85.7% for tumors, at 6 months.

Conclusion: This bicentric first-in-human pilot study suggests both feasibility and safety of a stereotactic CT-guided EPIONE device for the percutaneous needle insertion during liver tumor thermal ablation.

Citing Articles

Robotic navigation-assisted percutaneous liver puncture: a pilot study.

Sigdel M, Fang Y, Sun Z, Sigdel M, Jiao D Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025; 15(2):1543-1554.

PMID: 39995746 PMC: 11847208. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-1584.


The clinical performance of robotic assisted navigation system versus conventional freehand technique for percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy.

Jing Y, Jing J, Liu J, Zhang J, Jin Y, Bai X Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5980.

PMID: 39966451 PMC: 11836355. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87987-5.


Democratization in abdominal ablation therapies: The impact of percutaneous robotic assistance on accuracy-A systematic review.

Uribe Rivera A, Gimenez M J Robot Surg. 2025; 19(1):53.

PMID: 39821378 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02158-4.


Minimally Invasive Image-Guided Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation of Adrenal Metastases.

Narayanan G, Gentile N, Gu K, Schiro B, Gandhi R, Pena C Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024; 48(1):77-83.

PMID: 39586931 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-024-03893-9.


Interventional Radiology Management of Bone Metastasis Pain: Strategies and Techniques.

Gravel G, Nobileau A, Guth A, Mellot F, Roussel A Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39562341 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-024-03879-7.


References
1.
Tinguely P, Frehner L, Lachenmayer A, Banz V, Weber S, Candinas D . Stereotactic Image-Guided Microwave Ablation for Malignant Liver Tumors-A Multivariable Accuracy and Efficacy Analysis. Front Oncol. 2020; 10:842. PMC: 7298123. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00842. View

2.
De Baere T, Roux C, Noel G, Delpla A, Deschamps F, Varin E . Robotic assistance for percutaneous needle insertion in the kidney: preclinical proof on a swine animal model. Eur Radiol Exp. 2022; 6(1):13. PMC: 8901810. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-022-00265-1. View

3.
Bale R, Putzer D, Schullian P . Local Treatment of Breast Cancer Liver Metastasis. Cancers (Basel). 2019; 11(9). PMC: 6770644. DOI: 10.3390/cancers11091341. View

4.
Filippiadis D, Binkert C, Pellerin O, Hoffmann R, Krajina A, Pereira P . Cirse Quality Assurance Document and Standards for Classification of Complications: The Cirse Classification System. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017; 40(8):1141-1146. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-017-1703-4. View

5.
Khalilzadeh O, Baerlocher M, Shyn P, Connolly B, Devane A, Morris C . Proposal of a New Adverse Event Classification by the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017; 28(10):1432-1437.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.06.019. View