» Articles » PMID: 36110698

Comparison of Zirconia to Dentin Bonding Using Resin-Based Luting Cements and Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement:

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2022 Sep 16
PMID 36110698
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strengths of zirconia to dentin using two resin-based luting cements and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC).

Materials And Methods: Thirty six zirconia blocks of 2 mm × 3 mm × 5 mm were milled and luted to the exposed dentin surfaces and grouped into three according to the cement used for luting: Group I - luted with Panavia F2.0, Group II - luted with RelyX U200, and Group III - luted with FujiCEM. After thermocycling, specimens were subjected to shear bond testing in an Universal Testing Machine (UTM). Data analysis using Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and Mann-Whitney -test with < 0.05 was done.

Results: Mean bond strengths were of the order Panavia F2.0 (5.99 MPa)>RelyX U200 (4.79MPa)>FujiCEM (1.59 MPa). Maximum failures were at the zirconia-cement interface and were adhesive in nature.

Conclusions: It can be concluded with the study that there is a better bonding of zirconia to dentin with resin-based luting cements than a RMGIC. The single-step resin-luting cement RelyX U200 produced comparable bond strength to that of a multistep Panavia F2.0.

Citing Articles

Micro-shear bond strength of a novel resin-modified glass ionomer luting cement (eRMGIC) functionalized with organophosphorus monomer to different dental substrates.

Khalil R, Al-Shamma A Heliyon. 2024; 10(9):e30851.

PMID: 38765086 PMC: 11101864. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30851.


Clinical outcomes of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia vs. porcelain-veneered zirconia fixed dental prosthesis, with an additional focus on the cement type: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shihabi S, Chrcanovic B Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 27(10):5755-5769.

PMID: 37626273 PMC: 10560185. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05219-4.

References
1.
Cehreli M, Kokat A, Akca K . CAD/CAM Zirconia vs. slip-cast glass-infiltrated Alumina/Zirconia all-ceramic crowns: 2-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009; 17(1):49-55. PMC: 4327614. DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000100010. View

2.
Federlin M, Krifka S, Herpich M, Hiller K, Schmalz G . Partial ceramic crowns: influence of ceramic thickness, preparation design and luting material on fracture resistance and marginal integrity in vitro. Oper Dent. 2007; 32(3):251-60. DOI: 10.2341/06-70. View

3.
Casas E, de Almeida A, Cimini Junior C, Gomes P, Machado Cornacchia T, Saffar J . Determination of tangential and normal components of oral forces. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008; 15(1):70-6. PMC: 4327216. DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572007000100015. View

4.
Manicone P, Iommetti P, Raffaelli L . An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent. 2007; 35(11):819-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.008. View

5.
Valandro L, Ozcan M, Amaral R, Vanderlei A, Bottino M . Effect of testing methods on the bond strength of resin to zirconia-alumina ceramic: microtensile versus shear test. Dent Mater J. 2009; 27(6):849-55. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.27.849. View