» Articles » PMID: 17555176

Partial Ceramic Crowns: Influence of Ceramic Thickness, Preparation Design and Luting Material on Fracture Resistance and Marginal Integrity in Vitro

Overview
Journal Oper Dent
Date 2007 Jun 9
PMID 17555176
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This in vitro study tested the effects of two different ceramic thicknesses, two preparation designs and two different luting agents on the marginal integrity and fracture resistance of partial ceramic crowns (PCC). Eighty extracted human molars were prepared according to the following preparation designs: a) Coverage of functional cusps/butt joint (n=40), b) Horizontal reduction of functional cusps (n=40). PCC (Vita Mark II, Cerec3 System) were fabricated and the ceramic thickness of the functional cusps was adjusted to (1): 0.5-1.0 mm and (2): 1.5-2.0 mm. PCC were adhesively luted to the cavities with either Excite/VariolinkII (VL) or RelyX Unicem (RX). The specimens were exposed to thermocycling and central mechanical loading (5000 x 5 degrees C-55 degrees C; 30 second/cycle; 50,0000 x 72.5N, 1.6Hz). Marginal integrity was assessed by evaluating dye penetration (fuchsine) on multiple sections in the bucco-oral direction by relating the actual penetration distance to the maximal length of the corresponding cavity wall (100%). Restoration/luting agent (RL)--and tooth/luting agent (TL) interfaces were evaluated separately. The data were statistically analyzed with the Mann Whitney U-test and the Error Rates Method (ERM), and the fracture rates were analyzed with the chi2-test. Dye penetration data indicated that ceramic thickness and luting agent had a statistically significant influence upon marginal integrity in general, irrespective of all other parameters (ERM): RX showed significantly lower microleakage along the RL interface than VL. VL revealed significantly lower microleakage at the TL interface than RX. Fifteen PCC of group 1 (0.5-1.0 mm) and two PCC of group 2 (1.5-2.0 mm) were fractured after thermocycling and central mechanical loading, with the difference being statistically significant. PCC fabricated from industrially sintered feldspathic ceramic should have at least a thickness of 1.5-2.0 mm in stress-bearing areas.

Citing Articles

Long-term performance of ceramic in/-onlays vs. cast gold partial crowns - a retrospective clinical study.

Krug R, Droste L, Schreiber C, Reichardt E, Krastl G, Hahn B Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(5):298.

PMID: 38702521 PMC: 11068672. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05682-7.


Randomized Clinical Split-Mouth Study on Partial Ceramic Crowns Luted with a Self-adhesive Resin Cement with or without Selective Enamel Etching: Long-Term Results after 15 Years.

Pfister J, Federlin M, Hiller K, Schmalz G, Buchalla W, Cieplik F J Adhes Dent. 2023; 25():177-186.

PMID: 37800873 PMC: 11734261. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.b4478817.


Thickness and Substrate Effect on the Mechanical Behaviour of Direct Occlusal Veneers.

Tribst J, Tach Q, de Kok P, Dal Piva A, Kuijs R, Kleverlaan C Int Dent J. 2022; 73(5):612-619.

PMID: 36509557 PMC: 10509395. DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.11.006.


Comparison of Zirconia to Dentin Bonding Using Resin-Based Luting Cements and Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement: .

Vivek V, Venugopal P, Divakar N, Bharath S, Sarin K, Mohammed N J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022; 14(Suppl 1):S460-S463.

PMID: 36110698 PMC: 9469435. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_779_21.


Fracture Resistance and Failure Mode of Mandibular Molar Restored by Occlusal Veneer: Effect of Material Type and Dental Bonding Surface.

Al-Zordk W, Saudi A, Abdelkader A, Taher M, Ghazy M Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(21).

PMID: 34772003 PMC: 8585144. DOI: 10.3390/ma14216476.