» Articles » PMID: 36107488

An Assessment of the Potential Benefits of Video Consultation in the Emergency Department: Mixed Methods Study

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2022 Sep 15
PMID 36107488
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: District general hospital emergency departments may refer patients to a tertiary center depending on the information available to a generalist clinician in discussion with a specialist team. If there is uncertainty, the lowest-risk strategy is often to transfer the patient. Video consultation allowing the specialist team to see and talk to the patient and local clinician while still in the emergency department could improve decision-making for patient transfer.

Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the potential benefit of real-time video consultation between remote specialists and emergency department patients and clinicians across all specialties.

Methods: Detailed patient data were collected prospectively for 6 months (between January 16, 2012, and July 15, 2012) on all patients presenting to a district general hospital emergency department who required input from a specialist team at the nearest tertiary care center. These patients were discussed retrospectively with the specialist teams to determine whether videoconferencing could have benefited their management. The logistics for the use of videoconferencing were explored.

Results: A total of 18,799 patients were seen in the emergency department during the study period. Among the 18,799 patients, 413 referrals (2.2%) were made to the tertiary center specialist teams. A review of the patients transferred indicated that 193 (46.7%) of the 413 patients who were referred might have benefited from video consultation (193/18,799, 1% of all patients). If the specialist team could be accessed via videoconferencing only while a senior member was available in the hospital (8:00 AM-10:00 PM), then a maximum of 5 patients per week across all specialties would use the equipment. If 24-hour specialist access was available, this would increase to 7 patients per week.

Conclusions: In regions where there is direct transportation of patients by ambulance to specialist centers and there is a regional picture archiving and communication system in place, video consultation between emergency department patients and specialists has limited potential to improve patient management.

References
1.
Benger J . A review of telemedicine in accident and emergency: the story so far. J Accid Emerg Med. 2000; 17(3):157-64. PMC: 1725374. DOI: 10.1136/emj.17.3.157. View

2.
Sejersten M, Sillesen M, Hansen P, Nielsen S, Nielsen H, Trautner S . Effect on treatment delay of prehospital teletransmission of 12-lead electrocardiogram to a cardiologist for immediate triage and direct referral of patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction to primary percutaneous coronary.... Am J Cardiol. 2008; 101(7):941-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.11.038. View

3.
Schwamm L, Rosenthal E, Hirshberg A, Schaefer P, Little E, Kvedar J . Virtual TeleStroke support for the emergency department evaluation of acute stroke. Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11(11):1193-7. DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.014. View

4.
Eze N, Lo S, Bray D, Toma A . The use of camera mobile phone to assess emergency ENT radiological investigations. Clin Otolaryngol. 2005; 30(3):230-3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2005.00982.x. View

5.
Westbrook J, Coiera E, Brear M, Stapleton S, Rob M, Murphy M . Impact of an ultrabroadband emergency department telemedicine system on the care of acutely ill patients and clinicians' work. Med J Aust. 2008; 188(12):704-8. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01850.x. View