» Articles » PMID: 18242925

A Web-based Telestroke System Facilitates Rapid Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients in Rural Emergency Departments

Overview
Journal J Emerg Med
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2008 Feb 5
PMID 18242925
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Patients in rural communities lack access to acute stroke therapies. Rapid administration of thrombolytic therapy increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome in ischemic stroke. We aimed to detail the safety, feasibility, and treatment times of thrombolytic therapy with a web-based telestroke system. At the Medical College of Georgia, we have developed a telestroke system (Remote Evaluation of Acute IsCHemic Stroke; REACH) in which emergency physicians in surrounding counties may consult stroke specialists at our institution. The web-based system allows the stroke consultant to obtain history, examine the patient with live video, and review computed tomography. A recommendation is made regarding the administration of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) before patient transport to the tertiary medical center. A systematic review of the literature was conducted regarding the use of tPA in academic and community hospitals. Symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation and stroke onset-to-treatment times were compared between the REACH network and other stroke care delivery systems. Between February 2003 and March 2006, 50 patients were treated with intravenous tPA using the REACH telestroke system. There was one (2%) symptomatic hemorrhage. The mean onset-to-treatment time was 127.6 min (95% confidence interval 117.1-138.0) using REACH compared with 145.9 min (95% confidence interval 126.9-164.9) in our Emergency Department and 147.8 min in other published systems. REACH, a web-based telestroke system, facilitates the safe administration of thrombolytic therapy to patients within rural communities suffering an acute ischemic stroke.

Citing Articles

Emergency care via video consultation: interviews on patient experiences from rural community hospitals in northern Sweden.

Arlebrant L, Dubois H, Creutzfeldt J, Edin-Liljegren A Int J Emerg Med. 2024; 17(1):109.

PMID: 39227787 PMC: 11370045. DOI: 10.1186/s12245-024-00703-4.


Is telestroke more effective than conventional treatment for acute ischemic stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient outcomes and thrombolysis rates.

Mohamed A, Elsherif S, Legere B, Fatima N, Shuaib A, Saqqur M Int J Stroke. 2023; 19(3):280-292.

PMID: 37752674 PMC: 10903130. DOI: 10.1177/17474930231206066.


Outcomes in patients with acute stroke treated at a comprehensive stroke center using telemedicine versus in-person assessments.

Ho W, Fawcett A J Telemed Telecare. 2023; 30(9):1487-1492.

PMID: 37125439 PMC: 11420581. DOI: 10.1177/1357633X231169115.


An Assessment of the Potential Benefits of Video Consultation in the Emergency Department: Mixed Methods Study.

Turner J, Clarke M, George G, Jones R, Pullinger R, Kharbanda R Interact J Med Res. 2022; 11(2):e36081.

PMID: 36107488 PMC: 9523531. DOI: 10.2196/36081.


Practical guidance for telemedicine use in neuro-oncology.

Strowd R, Dunbar E, Gan H, Kurz S, Jordan J, Mandel J Neurooncol Pract. 2022; 9(2):91-104.

PMID: 35371525 PMC: 8965064. DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac002.