Proximal Ulna Non-union: Treatment Concept and Postoperative Outcome

Overview

Journal Int Orthop

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2022 Sep 14

PMID 36102978

Authors

Tim Jakobi

Yves Gramlich

Matthias Sauter

Sebastian Fischer

Reinhard Hoffmann

Alexander Klug

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Non-union of the proximal ulna is a serious complication after surgical treatment of olecranon and complex elbow fractures, frequently leading to poor functional outcome. To date, there is a lack of data regarding optimal treatment strategies and functional outcome parameters after surgical revision.

Methods: From 02/2010 to 12/2018, 31 patients undergoing surgical treatment of proximal ulna non-union could be included. Follow-up period was seven years (SD 2.5 years). All patients were clinically assessed using a clinical assessment tool set and standard elbow scores (MEPS, OES, DASH score). All complications and unplanned revision surgeries were recorded and all radiographic material was analyzed.

Results: Initial non-union procedures were performed at an average of 6.6 months (SD 3 months) after the index procedures. Those included the use of autologous spongiosa graft in all patients and concomitant compression re-osteosynthesis in 28 patients. Radiological consolidation was achieved in all patients. Overall, patients achieved a good to fair functional outcome with Mayo elbow performance score measuring 78.5 (SD 9.1), DASH score 34.7 (SD 14.4), and Oxford elbow score 31.2 (SD 6.6) points. Initial malreduction/implant-malposition could be identified as a main reason for the occurrence of the non-union. Furthermore, inferior postoperative outcome was detected in patients > 60 years and BMI > 30 kg/m.

Conclusion: Using a standardized protocol, bony union and acceptable functional outcomes can be achieved in proximal ulna non-unions. However, surgeons should be aware of potential risk factors and proper initial fracture reduction as key to achieve sufficient bone healing.

References

Rupp M, Biehl C, Budak M, Thormann U, Heiss C, Alt V . Diaphyseal long bone nonunions - types, aetiology, economics, and treatment recommendations. Int Orthop. 2017; 42(2):247-258. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3734-5. View

Papagelopoulos P, Morrey B . Treatment of nonunion of olecranon fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994; 76(4):627-35. View

Tian R, Zheng F, Zhao W, Zhang Y, Yuan J, Zhang B . Prevalence and influencing factors of nonunion in patients with tibial fracture: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020; 15(1):377. PMC: 7469357. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01904-2. View

Wang Z, Lu Y, Sun L, Song L, Ma T, Wang Q . Do the successful revision surgery for humeral nonunion solve all the effects on health-related quality of life? A retrospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):414. PMC: 8097853. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04283-9. View

Kloen P, Wiggers J, Buijze G . Treatment of diaphyseal non-unions of the ulna and radius. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010; 130(12):1439-45. PMC: 2991229. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-010-1071-x. View

Lapcin O, Arikan Y, Yavuz U, Akman Y, Cetinkaya E, Gur V . Evaluation of outcomes in aseptic non-unions of the forearm bones in adults treated with LCP and autograft. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2016; 22(3):283-9. DOI: 10.5505/tjtes.2015.73780. View

Rotini R, Antonioli D, Marinelli A, Katusic D . Surgical treatment of proximal ulna nonunion. Chir Organi Mov. 2008; 91(2):65-70. DOI: 10.1007/s12306-007-0011-6. View

Wittauer M, Burch M, McNally M, Vandendriessche T, Clauss M, Della Rocca G . Definition of long-bone nonunion: A scoping review of prospective clinical trials to evaluate current practice. Injury. 2021; 52(11):3200-3205. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.09.008. View

Calori G, Mazza E, Mazzola S, Colombo A, Giardina F, Romano F . Non-unions. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2017; 14(2):186-188. PMC: 5726207. DOI: 10.11138/ccmbm/2017.14.1.186. View

10.

Everding J, Rosslenbroich S, Raschke M . [Pseudarthroses of the long bones]. Chirurg. 2017; 89(1):73-88. DOI: 10.1007/s00104-017-0547-4. View

11.

Dawson J, Doll H, Boller I, Fitzpatrick R, Little C, Rees J . The development and validation of a patient-reported questionnaire to assess outcomes of elbow surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90(4):466-73. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.20290. View

12.

Bell A, Templeman D, Weinlein J . Nonunion of the Femur and Tibia: An Update. Orthop Clin North Am. 2016; 47(2):365-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2015.09.010. View

13.

Mechrefe A, Koh E, Trafton P, DiGiovanni C . Tibial nonunion. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006; 11(1):1-18, vii. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2005.12.003. View

14.

Smolle M, Leitner L, Bohler N, Seibert F, Glehr M, Leithner A . Fracture, nonunion and postoperative infection risk in the smoking orthopaedic patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EFORT Open Rev. 2021; 6(11):1006-1019. PMC: 8631245. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210058. View

15.

Mustonen A, Koivikko M, Kiuru M, Salo J, Koskinen S . Postoperative MDCT of tibial plateau fractures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193(5):1354-60. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.2260. View

16.

Palmanovich E, Brin Y, Kish B, Nyska M, Hetsroni I . Value of Early Postoperative Computed Tomography Assessment in Ankle Fractures Defining Joint Congruity and Criticizing the Need for Early Revision Surgery. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016; 55(3):465-9. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2016.01.013. View

17.

Foulke B, Kendal A, Murray D, Pandit H . Fracture healing in the elderly: A review. Maturitas. 2016; 92:49-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.07.014. View

18.

Zura R, Xiong Z, Einhorn T, Watson J, Ostrum R, Prayson M . Epidemiology of Fracture Nonunion in 18 Human Bones. JAMA Surg. 2016; 151(11):e162775. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2775. View

19.

Zura R, Mehta S, Della Rocca G, Steen R . Biological Risk Factors for Nonunion of Bone Fracture. JBJS Rev. 2016; 4(1). DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.O.00008. View