» Articles » PMID: 32883313

Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Nonunion in Patients with Tibial Fracture: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2020 Sep 5
PMID 32883313
Citations 69
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of nonunion in patients with tibia fracture and the association between influencing factors and tibia fracture nonunion.

Method: A database searches of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Weipu database, and Wanfang database from inception until June 2019 was conducted. The pooled prevalence, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated with Stata software.

Results: In this study, 111 studies involving 41,429 subjects were included. In the study of the relationship between influencing factors and tibia fracture nonunion, 15 factors significantly influenced the fracture union, including > 60 years old, male, tobacco smoker, body mass index > 40, diabetes, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) user, opioids user, fracture of middle and distal tibia, high-energy fracture, open fracture, Gustilo-Anderson grade IIIB or IIIC, Müller AO Classification of Fractures C, open reduction, fixation model, and infection.

Conclusion: The prevalence of nonunion in patients with tibia fracture was 0.068 and 15 potential factors were associated with the prevalence. Closed reduction and minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) have the low risks of nonunion for the treatment of tibial fractures.

Citing Articles

High rate of complications with exchange nailing for femoral nonunions.

Averkamp B, Yu Z, Mastracci J, Braswell M, Chen A, Lopas L OTA Int. 2025; 8(2):e387.

PMID: 40061869 PMC: 11888975. DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000387.


Surgical treatment of AO/OTA 41B3 and 41C tibial plateau fractures with a temporary bi-frame fixator combined with the MIPPO technique.

Li X, Wu J, Ye L, Huang L, Huang J BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):1064.

PMID: 39725912 PMC: 11670463. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08230-2.


Nonunion of Fractures: A Review of Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Clinical Features in Recent Literature.

Gharu E, John B Indian J Orthop. 2024; 58(12):1680-1685.

PMID: 39664347 PMC: 11628462. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-024-01249-6.


Staged Fixation with Respect to Soft Tissue in Tibial Plateau Fractures with Acute Compartment Syndrome: Correlation Analysis of Complications.

Yoon Y, Kim Y, Oh C, Kim H, Sim S, Son S Clin Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(6):854-862.

PMID: 39618523 PMC: 11604553. DOI: 10.4055/cios24058.


Male Sex Is an Associated Factor for Delayed Bone Union Following Hybrid Closed-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy.

Kikuchi N, Arai N, Okuno K, Kanamori A Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(11).

PMID: 39596957 PMC: 11596553. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60111772.


References
1.
Wani I, Ul Gani N, Yaseen M, Bashir A, Bhat M, Farooq M . Operative Management of Distal Tibial Extra-articular Fractures - Intramedullary Nail Versus Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2018; 19(6):537-541. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.8045. View

2.
Ebraheim N, Evans B, Liu X, Tanios M, Gillette M, Liu J . Comparison of intramedullary nail, plate, and external fixation in the treatment of distal tibia nonunions. Int Orthop. 2017; 41(9):1925-1934. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3432-3. View

3.
Lian H, Huang J . [EFFECTIVENESS COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT OPERATIVE METHODS IN TREATMENT OF CLOSED FRACTURE OF TIBIAL SHAFT]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016; 29(9):1067-71. View

4.
Schmitz M, Finnegan M, Natarajan R, Champine J . Effect of smoking on tibial shaft fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000; (365):184-200. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199908000-00024. View

5.
Costa M, Achten J, Hennings S, Boota N, Griffin J, Petrou S . Intramedullary nail fixation versus locking plate fixation for adults with a fracture of the distal tibia: the UK FixDT RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2018; 22(25):1-148. PMC: 5985455. DOI: 10.3310/hta22250. View