Outcomes for Type C Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Adult Population: Comparison of Nonoperative Treatment, Locked Plate Fixation, and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Overview

Journal JSES Int

Date 2022 Sep 9

PMID 36081702

Authors

S Andrew Samborski

Brittany E Haws

Steven Karnyski

Gillian Soles

John T Gorczyca

Gregg Nicandri

Ilya Voloshin

John P Ketz

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: This study compares patient-reported outcomes and range of motion (ROM) between adults with an AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association type C proximal humerus fracture managed nonoperatively, with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA).

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients >60 years of age treated with nonoperative management, ORIF, or RSA for AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 11C proximal humerus fractures from 2015 to 2018. Visual analog scale pain scores, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores, ROM values, and complication and reoperation rates were compared using analysis of variance for continuous variables and chi square analysis for categorical variables.

Results: A total of 88 patients were included: 41 nonoperative, 23 ORIF, and 24 RSA. At the 2-week follow-up, ORIF and RSA had lower visual analog scale scores and lower PROMIS pain interference scores ( < .05) than nonoperative treatment. At the 6-week follow-up, ORIF and RSA had lower visual analog scale, PROMIS pain interference, and PF scores and better ROM ( < .05) than nonoperative treatment. At the 3-month follow-up, ORIF and RSA had better ROM and PROMIS pain interference and PF scores ( < .05) than nonoperative treatment. At the 6-month follow-up, ORIF and RSA had better ROM and PROMIS PF scores ( < .05) than nonoperative treatment. There was a significantly higher complication rate in the ORIF group than in the non-operative and RSA groups ( < .05).

Conclusion: The management of AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 11C proximal humerus fractures in older adults with RSA or ORIF led to early decreased pain and improved physical function and ROM compared to nonoperative management at the expense of a higher complication rate in the ORIF group.

Citing Articles

Comparison between arthroplasty and non-operative treatment for proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lai B, Zhang S, Pan J, Li A, Guo D, Peng Z Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1436000.

PMID: 39309678 PMC: 11413808. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1436000.

Application of Intramedullary Calcar Support Plate and Lateral Locking Plate in Elderly Patients with Neer 3 and 4-Part Fractures of Proximal Humerus Through a Deltoid Splitting Approach.

Wang Y, Zhao L, Liu C, Qin K Indian J Orthop. 2024; 58(4):362-370.

PMID: 38544541 PMC: 10963710. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-024-01098-3.

A Standardized Operative Protocol for Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures Using a Locking Plate to Minimize Surgery-Related Complications.

Kwisda S, Imiolczyk J, Imiolczyk T, Werth M, Scheibel M J Clin Med. 2023; 12(3).

PMID: 36769863 PMC: 9917760. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12031216.

Double Plating for Complex Proximal Humeral Fractures: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes.

Michel P, Raschke M, Katthagen J, Schliemann B, Reissberg I, Riesenbeck O J Clin Med. 2023; 12(2).

PMID: 36675625 PMC: 9860712. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12020696.

References

Rangan A, Handoll H, Brealey S, Jefferson L, Keding A, Corbacho Martin B . Surgical vs nonsurgical treatment of adults with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: the PROFHER randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015; 313(10):1037-47. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.1629. View

Goldenberg B, Samuelsen B, Spratt J, Dornan G, Millett P . Complications and implant survivorship following primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients younger than 65 years: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; 29(8):1703-1711. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.02.004. View

Olerud P, Ahrengart L, Ponzer S, Saving J, Tidermark J . Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 3-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20(5):747-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.12.018. View

Schairer W, Nwachukwu B, Lyman S, Craig E, Gulotta L . Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24(10):1560-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.03.018. View

Paavolainen P, Bjorkenheim J, Slatis P, Paukku P . Operative treatment of severe proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1983; 54(3):374-9. DOI: 10.3109/17453678308996587. View

Kancherla V, Singh A, Anakwenze O . Management of Acute Proximal Humeral Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016; 25(1):42-52. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00240. View

Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis A, Balg F . Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005; 14(1 Suppl S):147S-161S. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.10.006. View

LaMartina 2nd J, Christmas K, Simon P, Streit J, Allert J, Clark J . Difficulty in decision making in the treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures: the effect of uncertainty on surgical outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 27(3):470-477. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.033. View

Shukla D, McAnany S, Kim J, Overley S, Parsons B . Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 25(2):330-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.08.030. View

10.

Cheung E, Willis M, Walker M, Clark R, Frankle M . Complications in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011; 19(7):439-49. View

11.

Calvo E, Morcillo D, Foruria A, Redondo-Santamaria E, Osorio-Picorne F, Caeiro J . Nondisplaced proximal humeral fractures: high incidence among outpatient-treated osteoporotic fractures and severe impact on upper extremity function and patient subjective health perception. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20(5):795-801. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.09.008. View

12.

Schnetzke M, Bockmeyer J, Porschke F, Studier-Fischer S, Grutzner P, Guehring T . Quality of Reduction Influences Outcome After Locked-Plate Fixation of Proximal Humeral Type-C Fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016; 98(21):1777-1785. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00112. View

13.

Hasty E, Jernigan 3rd E, Soo A, Varkey D, Kamath G . Trends in Surgical Management and Costs for Operative Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly. Orthopedics. 2017; 40(4):e641-e647. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20170411-03. View

14.

Yahuaca B, Simon P, Christmas K, Patel S, Gorman 2nd R, Mighell M . Acute surgical management of proximal humerus fractures: ORIF vs. hemiarthroplasty vs. reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; 29(7S):S32-S40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.012. View

15.

Neer 2nd C . Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970; 52(6):1090-103. View

16.

Li Y, Zhao L, Zhu L, Li J, Chen A . Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment for displaced 3-part or 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2013; 8(9):e75464. PMC: 3774627. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075464. View

17.

Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, Leunig M . Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004; 13(4):427-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.01.034. View

18.

Owsley K, Gorczyca J . Fracture displacement and screw cutout after open reduction and locked plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures [corrected]. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(2):233-40. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01351. View

19.

Ross M, Hope B, Stokes A, Peters S, McLeod I, Duke P . Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three-part and four-part proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 24(2):215-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.05.022. View

20.

Orman S, Mohamadi A, Serino J, Murphy J, Hanna P, Weaver M . Comparison of surgical and non-surgical treatments for 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures: A network meta-analysis. Shoulder Elbow. 2020; 12(2):99-108. PMC: 7153210. DOI: 10.1177/1758573219831506. View