A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial to Assess the Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Preemptive Caudal Morphine As an Adjunct to Bupivacaine for Lumbosacral Spine Surgeries in Adults

Overview

Journal Cureus

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2022 Sep 8

PMID 36072182

Authors

Amit K Malviya

Chhavi Sawhney

Dalim K Baidya

Sulagna Bhattacharjee

Ajeet Kumar

Kamran Farooque

Mahesh Arora

Anjolie Chhabra

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background The analgesic efficacy of preemptive administration of caudal morphine for spine surgeries in adults is not well studied. In a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial, safety and analgesic efficacy of preemptive, single-shot caudal morphine and bupivacaine was compared with caudal bupivacaine alone in lumbosacral spine surgeries. Methods After Institutional Ethics Committee approval, 40 patients aged 18-60 yrs planned for lumbosacral spine surgery were randomized to groups of 20 patients each. After induction and prone positioning, an ultrasound-guided caudal block was performed with morphine 50 µg/kg with 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine in the study group (LM) and only bupivacaine in the control group (LA). Postoperatively, both groups received intravenous morphine via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump (No basal, 1 mg/bolus, 10 minutes lockout interval). Intraoperative fentanyl use, postoperative 24-h morphine consumption, visual analogue pain scores (VAS) and adverse effects of morphine were noted. Results Demographics and baseline data were comparable. Postoperative 24-hour morphine requirement was more in LA group (34.3 ± 10.7 mg vs 19.65 ± 11.8 mg, p=0.0001). Total intraoperative supplemental fentanyl requirement was similar (79.25 ± 67.60 µg in LA vs 54 ± 50.20 µg in LM group, p=0.28). VAS scores at 2/4/6/12-hour in group-LM were significantly less than group-LA (p=0.005, 0.002, 0.001 and 0.047) but were comparable at 18 and 24 hours (p=0.25, 0.42). Postoperative incidence of adverse effects of morphine was comparable. Conclusions Ultrasound-guided, single-shot preemptive administration of caudal morphine with bupivacaine is a safe and effective modality of analgesia for patients undergoing lumbosacral spine surgeries.

References

Stitz M, Sommer H . Accuracy of blind versus fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injection. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24(13):1371-6. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199907010-00016. View

Kumar S, Palaniappan J, Kishan A . Preemptive Caudal Ropivacaine: An Effective Analgesic during Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery. Asian Spine J. 2017; 11(1):113-119. PMC: 5326719. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.1.113. View

Jensen B . Caudal block for post-operative pain relief in children after genital operations. A comparison between bupivacaine and morphine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1981; 25(5):373-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1981.tb01668.x. View

Woolf C, Chong M . Preemptive analgesia--treating postoperative pain by preventing the establishment of central sensitization. Anesth Analg. 1993; 77(2):362-79. DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199377020-00026. View

Waxler B, Dadabhoy Z, Stojiljkovic L, Rabito S . Primer of postoperative pruritus for anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2005; 103(1):168-78. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200507000-00025. View

Kalappa S, Sridhara R, Kumaraswamy S . Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Pre-Emptive Caudal Epidural Ropivacaine for Lumbosacral Spine Surgeries. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016; 10(1):UC22-4. PMC: 4740683. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/15286.7145. View

Sekar C, Rajasekaran S, Kannan R, Reddy S, Shetty T, Pithwa Y . Preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief in lumbosacral spine surgeries: a randomized controlled trial. Spine J. 2004; 4(3):261-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.11.009. View

Renfrew D, Moore T, Kathol M, El-Khoury G, Lemke J, Walker C . Correct placement of epidural steroid injections: fluoroscopic guidance and contrast administration. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991; 12(5):1003-7. PMC: 8333499. View

Al-Khalaf B, LOEW F, Fichtl M, Donauer E . Prospective comparative study of the effectiveness of epidural morphine and ropivacaine for management of pain after spinal operations. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2003; 145(1):11-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-002-0955-0. View

10.

Chatterjee S, Rudra A, Sengupta S . Current concepts in the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2011; 2011:748031. PMC: 3216269. DOI: 10.1155/2011/748031. View

11.

Joo J, Kim J, Lee J . The prevalence of anatomical variations that can cause inadvertent dural puncture when performing caudal block in Koreans: a study using magnetic resonance imaging. Anaesthesia. 2009; 65(1):23-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06168.x. View

12.

Borgeat A, Ekatodramis G, Schenker C . Postoperative nausea and vomiting in regional anesthesia: a review. Anesthesiology. 2003; 98(2):530-47. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200302000-00036. View

13.

. Practice Guidelines for the Prevention, Detection, and Management of Respiratory Depression Associated with Neuraxial Opioid Administration: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Neuraxial Opioids and the.... Anesthesiology. 2015; 124(3):535-52. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000975. View

14.

Raw D, Beattie J, Hunter J . Anaesthesia for spinal surgery in adults. Br J Anaesth. 2003; 91(6):886-904. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeg253. View

15.

Gan T, Diemunsch P, Habib A, Kovac A, Kranke P, Meyer T . Consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2013; 118(1):85-113. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000002. View

16.

Dunn L, Durieux M, Nemergut E . Non-opioid analgesics: Novel approaches to perioperative analgesia for major spine surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2016; 30(1):79-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2015.11.002. View

17.

Devin C, McGirt M . Best evidence in multimodal pain management in spine surgery and means of assessing postoperative pain and functional outcomes. J Clin Neurosci. 2015; 22(6):930-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.01.003. View

18.

Kim Y, Park H, Cho S, Moon D . Assessment of factors affecting the difficulty of caudal epidural injections in adults using ultrasound. Pain Res Manag. 2014; 19(5):275-9. PMC: 4197755. DOI: 10.1155/2014/679128. View

19.

Kalappa S, Sridhar R, Nagappa S . Comparing the Efficacy of Caudal with Intravenous Dexamethasone in the Management of Pain Following Lumbosacral Spine Surgeries: A Randomized Double Blinded Controlled Study. Anesth Essays Res. 2017; 11(2):416-420. PMC: 5490116. DOI: 10.4103/0259-1162.194581. View

20.

Kakiuchi M, Abe K . Pre-incisional caudal epidural blockade and the relief of pain after lumbar spine operations. Int Orthop. 1997; 21(1):62-6. PMC: 3615687. DOI: 10.1007/s002640050121. View