» Articles » PMID: 36039892

Third-line Antiretroviral Therapy, Including Raltegravir (RAL), Darunavir (DRV/r) And/or Etravirine (ETR), is Well Tolerated and Achieves Durable Virologic Suppression over 144 Weeks in Resource-limited Settings: ACTG A5288 Strategy Trial

Abstract

Introduction: ACTG A5288 was a strategy trial conducted in diverse populations from multiple continents of people living with HIV (PLWH) failing second-line protease inhibitor (PI)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) from 10 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Participants resistant to lopinavir (LPV) and/or multiple nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors started on third-line regimens that included raltegravir (RAL), darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) and/or etravirine (ETR) according to their resistance profiles. At 48 weeks, 87% of these participants achieved HIV-1 RNA ≤200 copies/ml. We report here long-term outcomes over 144 weeks.

Methods: Study participants were enrolled from 2013 to 2015, prior to the availability of dolutegravir in LMICs. "Extended Follow-up" of the study started after the last participant enrolled had reached 48 weeks and included participants still on antiretroviral (ARV) regimens containing RAL, DRV/r and/or ETR at that time. RAL, DRV/r and ETR were provided for an additional 96 weeks (giving total follow-up of ≥144 weeks), with HIV-1 RNA measured at 48 and 96 weeks and CD4 count at 96 weeks after entry into Extended Follow-up. Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≤200 copies/ml was estimated every 24 weeks, using imputation if necessary to handle the different measurement schedule in Extended Follow-up; mean CD4 count changes were estimated using loess regression.

Results And Discussion: Of 257 participants (38% females), at study entry, median CD4 count was 179 cells/mm , and HIV-1 RNA was 4.6 log copies/ml. Median follow-up was 168 weeks (IQR: 156-204); 15 (6%) participants were lost to follow-up and 9 (4%) died. 27/246 (11%), 26/246 (11%) and 13/92 (14%) of participants who started RAL, DRV/r and ETR, respectively, discontinued these drugs; only three due to adverse events. 87%, 86%, 83% and 80% of the participants had HIV-1 RNA ≤200 copies/ml at weeks 48, 96, 144 and 168 (95% CI at week 168: 74-85%), respectively. Mean increase from study entry in CD4 count at week 168 was 265 cells/mm (95% CI 247-283).

Conclusions: Third-line regimens comprising of RAL, DRV/r and/or ETR were very well tolerated and had high rates of durable virologic suppression among PLWH in LMICs who were failing on second-line PI-based ART prior to the availability of dolutegravir.

Citing Articles

Viral load suppression rate of third-line antiretroviral therapy and its association with gender among HIV patients after second-line treatment failure in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tsega T, Tsega S, Gebeyehu A, Yemata G, Anteneh R, Yeshiwas A BMC Infect Dis. 2025; 25(1):158.

PMID: 39901068 PMC: 11792664. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-025-10576-4.


Virologic suppression rate and associated factors for third-line HIV treatment in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Berhane A, Chimdesa H, Awedew A, Bekele N, Teferi H, WYohannes G BMC Infect Dis. 2024; 24(1):1068.

PMID: 39342155 PMC: 11439281. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-024-10002-1.


Virological outcomes of third-line antiretroviral therapy in a global context: a systematic reviews and meta-analysis.

Kitaw T, Abate B, Yilak G, Tilahun B, Faris A, Walle G AIDS Res Ther. 2024; 21(1):43.

PMID: 38918866 PMC: 11197289. DOI: 10.1186/s12981-024-00630-7.


Development and emerging trends of drug resistance mutations in HIV: a bibliometric analysis based on CiteSpace.

Chen X, Chen X, Lai Y Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1374582.

PMID: 38812690 PMC: 11133539. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1374582.


Relationship between self-efficacy and adherence to antiretroviral therapy in HIV/AIDS patients: An analytical cross-sectional study in southern Iran.

Hosseini Z, Ezati Rad R, Shahabi N, Mohseni S, Hassani Azad M, Aghamolaei T Health Sci Rep. 2024; 7(2):e1879.

PMID: 38343662 PMC: 10853592. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.1879.

References
1.
Paton N, Kityo C, Thompson J, Nankya I, Bagenda L, Hoppe A . Nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor cross-resistance and outcomes from second-line antiretroviral therapy in the public health approach: an observational analysis within the randomised, open-label, EARNEST trial. Lancet HIV. 2017; 4(8):e341-e348. PMC: 5555436. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30065-6. View

2.
Rosenbloom D, Hill A, Rabi S, Siliciano R, Nowak M . Antiretroviral dynamics determines HIV evolution and predicts therapy outcome. Nat Med. 2012; 18(9):1378-85. PMC: 3490032. DOI: 10.1038/nm.2892. View

3.
Levison J, Orrell C, Gallien S, Kuritzkes D, Fu N, Losina E . Virologic failure of protease inhibitor-based second-line antiretroviral therapy without resistance in a large HIV treatment program in South Africa. PLoS One. 2012; 7(3):e32144. PMC: 3302781. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032144. View

4.
Chakravarty J, Sundar S, Chourasia A, Singh P, Kurle S, Tripathy S . Outcome of patients on second line antiretroviral therapy under programmatic condition in India. BMC Infect Dis. 2015; 15:517. PMC: 4647630. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-015-1270-8. View

5.
Ajose O, Mookerjee S, Mills E, Boulle A, Ford N . Treatment outcomes of patients on second-line antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS. 2012; 26(8):929-38. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328351f5b2. View