» Articles » PMID: 36032350

Investigation of the Added Value of CT-based Radiomics in Predicting the Development of Brain Metastases in Patients with Radically Treated Stage III NSCLC

Abstract

Introduction: Despite radical intent therapy for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), cumulative incidence of brain metastases (BM) reaches 30%. Current risk stratification methods fail to accurately identify these patients. As radiomics features have been shown to have predictive value, this study aims to develop a model combining clinical risk factors with radiomics features for BM development in patients with radically treated stage III NSCLC.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of two prospective multicentre studies. Inclusion criteria: adequately staged [F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18-FDG-PET-CT), contrast-enhanced chest CT, contrast-enhanced brain magnetic resonance imaging/CT] and radically treated stage III NSCLC, exclusion criteria: second primary within 2 years of NSCLC diagnosis and prior prophylactic cranial irradiation. Primary endpoint was BM development any time during follow-up (FU). CT-based radiomics features ( = 530) were extracted from the primary lung tumour on 18-FDG-PET-CT images, and a list of clinical features ( = 8) was collected. Univariate feature selection based on the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic was performed to identify relevant features. Generalized linear models were trained using the selected features, and multivariate predictive performance was assessed through the AUC.

Results: In total, 219 patients were eligible for analysis. Median FU was 59.4 months for the training cohort and 67.3 months for the validation cohort; 21 (15%) and 17 (22%) patients developed BM in the training and validation cohort, respectively. Two relevant clinical features (age and adenocarcinoma histology) and four relevant radiomics features were identified as predictive. The clinical model yielded the highest AUC value of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.58-0.84), better than radiomics or a combination of clinical parameters and radiomics (both an AUC of 0.62, 95% CIs of 0.47-076 and 0.48-0.76, respectively).

Conclusion: CT-based radiomics features of primary NSCLC in the current setup could not improve on a model based on clinical predictors (age and adenocarcinoma histology) of BM development in radically treated stage III NSCLC patients.

Citing Articles

Risk factors for brain metastases in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with radical radiotherapy.

Xu X, Chen G, Fan S, Zhang Q, Huang W, Chen J J Thorac Dis. 2024; 16(1):479-490.

PMID: 38410550 PMC: 10894422. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-1435.


A cuproptosis score model and prognostic score model can evaluate clinical characteristics and immune microenvironment in NSCLC.

Tang Y, Wang T, Li Q, Shi J Cancer Cell Int. 2024; 24(1):68.

PMID: 38341588 PMC: 10859031. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-024-03267-8.


Enhancing brain metastasis prediction in non-small cell lung cancer: a deep learning-based segmentation and CT radiomics-based ensemble learning model.

Gong J, Wang T, Wang Z, Chu X, Hu T, Li M Cancer Imaging. 2024; 24(1):1.

PMID: 38167564 PMC: 10759676. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-023-00623-1.


Radiological artificial intelligence - predicting personalized immunotherapy outcomes in lung cancer.

Roisman L, Kian W, Anoze A, Fuchs V, Spector M, Steiner R NPJ Precis Oncol. 2023; 7(1):125.

PMID: 37990050 PMC: 10663598. DOI: 10.1038/s41698-023-00473-x.


The Association of Gross Tumor Volume and Its Radiomics Features with Brain Metastases Development in Patients with Radically Treated Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Zeng H, Tohidinezhad F, De Ruysscher D, Willems Y, Degens J, van Kampen-van den Boogaart V Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(11).

PMID: 37296973 PMC: 10252119. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15113010.


References
1.
Chen A, Lu L, Pu X, Yu T, Yang H, Schwartz L . CT-Based Radiomics Model for Predicting Brain Metastasis in Category T1 Lung Adenocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019; 213(1):134-139. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.18.20591. View

2.
Ibrahim A, Refaee T, Leijenaar R, Primakov S, Hustinx R, Mottaghy F . The application of a workflow integrating the variable reproducibility and harmonizability of radiomic features on a phantom dataset. PLoS One. 2021; 16(5):e0251147. PMC: 8104396. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251147. View

3.
Bae K . Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. Radiology. 2010; 256(1):32-61. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10090908. View

4.
De Ruysscher D, Dingemans A, Praag J, Belderbos J, Tissing-Tan C, Herder J . Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation Versus Observation in Radically Treated Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Phase III NVALT-11/DLCRG-02 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36(23):2366-2377. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.5817. View

5.
Zwanenburg A, Vallieres M, Abdalah M, Aerts H, Andrearczyk V, Apte A . The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping. Radiology. 2020; 295(2):328-338. PMC: 7193906. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020191145. View