» Articles » PMID: 36016864

Characteristics and Trends of the Most Cited Papers in Robotic Assisted Arthroplasty

Overview
Journal J Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2022 Aug 26
PMID 36016864
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compile and analyze the top 50 most frequently cited articles published on robotic-assisted arthroplasty, allowing clinicians to effectively identify the most influential literature pertaining to this topic.

Methods: Guidelines set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews were used as the foundation for data collection and analysis. All papers pertaining to robotic-assisted arthroplasty were retrieved using the Scopus database. Data including: manuscript title, authors, total citation count, level of evidence, journal, publication year, and country of publication was extracted from a final list of articles.

Results: The top 50 publications regarding robotic assisted arthroplasty were cited a total of 4530 times (including self-citations), with an average total of 91. The years with the most publications in the top 50 were: 2017, 2018, and 2019, producing 7, 6, and 5 papers, respectively. Only 4 papers in the top 50 were published prior to the year 2003. The most common level of evidence was level V, and the most common category was Clinical Outcomes (74%). The United States contributed half of the 50 articles, and Princess Grace Hospital and University of London were the most contributory institutions, each with 6 of the top 50 articles.

Conclusion: This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the most cited and influential papers in robotic-assisted arthroplasty. Understanding these trends in the literature will ultimately pave the way for physicians and researchers to continue to innovate and research in a targeted manner as they gain an understanding of what has been studied and what remains inadequately explored.

Level Of Evidence: 3.

Citing Articles

Tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO): A review of impactful papers in the literature.

Costello 2nd J, Patel N, Chen J, Tandron M, Goldenberg B, Baraga M J Orthop. 2024; 60:89-95.

PMID: 39399320 PMC: 11465036. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.08.011.


From past to digital time: Bibliometric perspective of worldwide research productivity on robotic and computer-assisted arthroplasty.

Shu B, Ou X, Shi S, Hu L Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241288736.

PMID: 39372812 PMC: 11456188. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241288736.


Robotic-Assisted Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis Using the Scopus Database.

Kow R, Abdul Rani R, Mohamad Nazarallah M, Leong J, Hayyun M, Low C Cureus. 2024; 16(3):e56617.

PMID: 38646377 PMC: 11031712. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56617.


Technology and orthopaedic surgeons.

Vaishya R, Haleem A J Orthop. 2022; 34:414-415.

PMID: 36568652 PMC: 9780058. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.08.018.

References
1.
Banerjee S, Cherian J, Elmallah R, Pierce T, Jauregui J, Mont M . Robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015; 13(1):47-56. DOI: 10.1586/17434440.2016.1124018. View

2.
Lefaivre K, Shadgan B, OBrien P . 100 most cited articles in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 469(5):1487-97. PMC: 3069275. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1604-1. View

3.
Lim S, Ko K, Park C, Moon Y, Park Y . Robot-assisted primary cementless total hip arthroplasty with a short femoral stem: a prospective randomized short-term outcome study. Comput Aided Surg. 2015; 20(1):41-6. DOI: 10.3109/10929088.2015.1076044. View

4.
Singh J, Yu S, Chen L, Cleveland J . Rates of Total Joint Replacement in the United States: Future Projections to 2020-2040 Using the National Inpatient Sample. J Rheumatol. 2019; 46(9):1134-1140. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.170990. View

5.
Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H, Vanlauwe J . Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 464:111-6. DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318126c0c0. View