» Articles » PMID: 36016669

Elucidating Tricuspid Doppler Signal Interpolation and Its Implication for Assessing Pulmonary Hypertension

Abstract

Doppler echocardiography plays a central role in the assessment of pulmonary hypertension (PAH). We aim to improve quality assessment of systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (SPAP) by applying a cubic polynomial interpolation to digitized tricuspid regurgitation (TR) waveforms. Patients with PAH and advanced lung disease were divided into three cohorts: a derivation cohort ( = 44), a validation cohort ( = 71), an outlier cohort ( = 26), and a non-PAH cohort ( = 44). We digitized TR waveforms and analyzed normalized duration, skewness, kurtosis, and first and second derivatives of pressure. Cubic polynomial interpolation was applied to three physiology-driven phases: the isovolumic phase, ejection phase, and "shoulder" point phase. Coefficients of determination and a Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess bias between methods. The cubic polynomial interpolation of the TR waveform correlated strongly with expert read right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) with > 0.910 in the validation cohort. The biases when compared to invasive SPAP measured within 24 h were 6.03 [4.33; 7.73], -2.94 [1.47; 4.41], and -3.11 [-4.52; -1.71] mmHg, for isovolumic, ejection, and shoulder point interpolations, respectively. In the outlier cohort with more than 30% difference between echocardiographic estimates and invasive SPAP, cubic polynomial interpolation significantly reduced underestimation of RVSP. Cubic polynomial interpolation of the TR waveform based on isovolumic or early ejection phase may improve RVSP estimates.

Citing Articles

Elucidating tricuspid Doppler signal interpolation and its implication for assessing pulmonary hypertension.

Dual S, Verdonk C, Amsallem M, Pham J, Obasohan C, Nataf P Pulm Circ. 2022; 12(3):e12125.

PMID: 36016669 PMC: 9395694. DOI: 10.1002/pul2.12125.

References
1.
Kyranis S, Latona J, Platts D, Kelly N, Savage M, Brown M . Improving the echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary pressure using the tricuspid regurgitant signal-The "chin" vs the "beard". Echocardiography. 2018; 35(8):1085-1096. DOI: 10.1111/echo.13893. View

2.
Amsallem M, Sternbach J, Adigopula S, Kobayashi Y, Vu T, Zamanian R . Addressing the Controversy of Estimating Pulmonary Arterial Pressure by Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015; 29(2):93-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.11.001. View

3.
Hozumi T, Yoshida K, Akasaka T, Takagi T, Yamamuro A, Yagi T . Automated assessment of mitral regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction by a newly developed digital color Doppler velocity profile integration method. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 80(10):1325-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00673-5. View

4.
Aduen J, Castello R, Daniels J, Diaz J, Safford R, Heckman M . Accuracy and precision of three echocardiographic methods for estimating mean pulmonary artery pressure. Chest. 2010; 139(2):347-352. DOI: 10.1378/chest.10-0126. View

5.
Simonneau G, Montani D, Celermajer D, Denton C, Gatzoulis M, Krowka M . Haemodynamic definitions and updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2018; 53(1). PMC: 6351336. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01913-2018. View