» Articles » PMID: 36015956

Recent Advances in Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring and Prediction Using a Machine Learning Approach

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2022 Aug 26
PMID 36015956
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) monitoring can be performed either invasively via arterial catheterization or non-invasively through a cuff sphygmomanometer. However, for conscious individuals, traditional cuff-based BP monitoring devices are often uncomfortable, intermittent, and impractical for frequent measurements. Continuous and non-invasive BP (NIBP) monitoring is currently gaining attention in the human health monitoring area due to its promising potentials in assessing the health status of an individual, enabled by machine learning (ML), for various purposes such as early prediction of disease and intervention treatment. This review presents the development of a non-invasive BP measuring tool called sphygmomanometer in brief, summarizes state-of-the-art NIBP sensors, and identifies extended works on continuous NIBP monitoring using commercial devices. Moreover, the NIBP predictive techniques including pulse arrival time, pulse transit time, pulse wave velocity, and ML are elaborated on the basis of bio-signals acquisition from these sensors. Additionally, the different BP values (systolic BP, diastolic BP, mean arterial pressure) of the various ML models adopted in several reported studies are compared in terms of the international validation standards developed by the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) and the British Hypertension Society (BHS) for clinically-approved BP monitors. Finally, several challenges and possible solutions for the implementation and realization of continuous NIBP technology are addressed.

Citing Articles

Assessing the Efficacy of Various Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Blood Pressure Using Pulse Transit Time.

Turki A Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39941190 PMC: 11816412. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15030261.


Artificial Intelligence-Based Diagnostic Support System for Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Premature Infants.

Park S, Moon J, Eun H, Hong J, Lee K J Clin Med. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 38610854 PMC: 11012712. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13072089.


Perioperative Patients With Hemodynamic Instability: Consensus Recommendations of the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation.

Scott M Anesth Analg. 2023; 138(4):713-724.

PMID: 38153876 PMC: 10916753. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006789.


Automatic Calibration of a Device for Blood Pressure Waveform Measurement.

Siemasz R, Tomczuk K, Malecha Z, Felisiak P, Weiser A Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(18).

PMID: 37766043 PMC: 10536530. DOI: 10.3390/s23187985.


Blood pressure estimation and classification using a reference signal-less photoplethysmography signal: a deep learning framework.

Pankaj , Kumar A, Komaragiri R, Kumar M Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023; 46(4):1589-1605.

PMID: 37747644 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01322-8.


References
1.
Athaya T, Choi S . A Review of Noninvasive Methodologies to Estimate the Blood Pressure Waveform. Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(10). PMC: 9145242. DOI: 10.3390/s22103953. View

2.
Farhan K, Naqvi S, Hasan Rizvi S, Zafar A, Rawala M . Comparison between blood pressure readings using a mercury versus an aneroid sphygmomanometer. Blood Press Monit. 2019; 25(1):34-38. DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000417. View

3.
Jordan T, Meyers C, Schrading W, Donnelly J . The utility of iPhone oximetry apps: A comparison with standard pulse oximetry measurement in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2019; 38(5):925-928. PMC: 6960362. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.07.020. View

4.
Juteau N, Gosselin B . Wearable Wireless-Enabled Oscillometric Sphygmomanometer: A Flexible Ambulatory Tool for Blood Pressure Estimation. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst. 2020; 14(6):1287-1298. DOI: 10.1109/TBCAS.2020.3026992. View

5.
Jeong D, Lim K . Combined deep CNN-LSTM network-based multitasking learning architecture for noninvasive continuous blood pressure estimation using difference in ECG-PPG features. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):13539. PMC: 8242087. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92997-0. View