» Articles » PMID: 36009024

Detecting Fear-Memory-Related Genes from Neuronal ScRNA-seq Data by Diverse Distributions and Bhattacharyya Distance

Overview
Journal Biomolecules
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Aug 26
PMID 36009024
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The detection of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) is one of most important computational challenges in the analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. However, due to the high heterogeneity and dropout noise inherent in scRNAseq data, challenges in detecting DEGs exist when using a single distribution of gene expression levels, leaving much room to improve the precision and robustness of current DEG detection methods. Here, we propose the use of a new method, DEGman, which utilizes several possible diverse distributions in combination with Bhattacharyya distance. DEGman can automatically select the best-fitting distributions of gene expression levels, and then detect DEGs by permutation testing of Bhattacharyya distances of the selected distributions from two cell groups. Compared with several popular DEG analysis tools on both large-scale simulation data and real scRNA-seq data, DEGman shows an overall improvement in the balance of sensitivity and precision. We applied DEGman to scRNA-seq data of mouse neurons to detect fear-memory-related genes that are significantly differentially expressed in neurons with and without fear memory. DEGman detected well-known fear-memory-related genes and many novel candidates. Interestingly, we found 25 DEGs in common in five neuron clusters that are functionally enriched for synaptic vesicles, indicating that the coupled dynamics of synaptic vesicles across in neurons plays a critical role in remote memory formation. The proposed method leverages the advantage of the use of diverse distributions in DEG analysis, exhibiting better performance in analyzing composite scRNA-seq datasets in real applications.

Citing Articles

Theoretical framework for the difference of two negative binomial distributions and its application in comparative analysis of sequencing data.

Petrany A, Chen R, Zhang S, Chen Y Genome Res. 2024; 34(10):1636-1650.

PMID: 39406498 PMC: 11529838. DOI: 10.1101/gr.278843.123.


The molecular landscape of neurological disorders: insights from single-cell RNA sequencing in neurology and neurosurgery.

Awuah W, Ahluwalia A, Ghosh S, Roy S, Tan J, Adebusoye F Eur J Med Res. 2023; 28(1):529.

PMID: 37974227 PMC: 10652629. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01504-w.


scTIGER: A Deep-Learning Method for Inferring Gene Regulatory Networks from Case versus Control scRNA-seq Datasets.

Dautle M, Zhang S, Chen Y Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(17).

PMID: 37686146 PMC: 10488287. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241713339.


The Application of Single-Cell RNA Sequencing in the Inflammatory Tumor Microenvironment.

Zhao J, Shi Y, Cao G Biomolecules. 2023; 13(2).

PMID: 36830713 PMC: 9953711. DOI: 10.3390/biom13020344.

References
1.
Eraslan G, Simon L, Mircea M, Mueller N, Theis F . Single-cell RNA-seq denoising using a deep count autoencoder. Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):390. PMC: 6344535. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07931-2. View

2.
Kandel E, Dudai Y, Mayford M . The molecular and systems biology of memory. Cell. 2014; 157(1):163-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.001. View

3.
Qiu X, Hill A, Packer J, Lin D, Ma Y, Trapnell C . Single-cell mRNA quantification and differential analysis with Census. Nat Methods. 2017; 14(3):309-315. PMC: 5330805. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4150. View

4.
Soneson C, Robinson M . Bias, robustness and scalability in single-cell differential expression analysis. Nat Methods. 2018; 15(4):255-261. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4612. View

5.
Gupta A, Kumar D . Fuzzy clustering-based feature extraction method for mental task classification. Brain Inform. 2016; 4(2):135-145. PMC: 5413590. DOI: 10.1007/s40708-016-0056-0. View