A Randomized Pilot Trial of a Mobile Phone-based Brief Intervention with Personalized Feedback and Interactive Text Messaging to Reduce Driving After Cannabis Use and Riding with a Cannabis Impaired Driver

Overview

Journal J Subst Abuse Treat

Specialty Psychiatry

Date 2022 Aug 25

PMID 36007434

Authors

Jenni B Teeters

Nicole M Armstrong

Shelby A King

Sterling M Hubbard

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Driving after cannabis use (DACU) and riding with a cannabis-impaired driver (RWCD) are national public health concerns. Though driving impairments and increased crash risk make DACU and RWCD two of the riskiest cannabis-related behaviors, many continue to drive after use and ride with others who are under the influence and do not view DACU or RWCD as dangerous. The current study examined the efficacy of an accessible, low-cost, mobile phone-based brief intervention aimed at reducing DACU and RWCD among college cannabis users in the context of a randomized three-group pilot trial.

Method: Participants were 97 college cannabis users (67.4 % women; average age = 21.34; 80.4 % Caucasian) who endorsed DACU at least three times in the past three months. After completing baseline measures, the study randomly assigned participants to one of three conditions: a) a substance impaired-driving personalized feedback plus MI-style interactive text messaging intervention (PF + MIT); b) a substance impaired-driving personalized feedback only intervention (PF); and c) a substance information control condition (IC). All conditions completed outcome measures three months postintervention.

Results: Generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) analyses indicated that after controlling for sex, cannabis users in the PF + MIT condition significantly reduced DACU and RWCD over time compared to those in the IC condition.

Conclusions: These findings provide preliminary support for the short-term efficacy of a mobile phone-based intervention in decreasing DACU and RWCD among college cannabis users. Future research should determine whether these reductions in driving behaviors persist past three months.

Citing Articles

Are Changes in Negative Cannabis Expectancies, Peer Approval, and Perceptions of Dangerousness of Driving After Cannabis Use Associated with Changes in Instances of Driving After Cannabis Use Following a Mobile-Phone Based Intervention?.

Elder S, Teeters J Cannabis. 2025; 8(1):165-176.

PMID: 39968480 PMC: 11831896. DOI: 10.26828/cannabis/2025/000287.

Young adult impaired driving behaviors and perceived norms of driving under the influence of simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use.

Hultgren B, Delawalla M, Szydlowski V, Guttmannova K, Cadigan J, Kilmer J Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2024; 48(12):2319-2330.

PMID: 39616528 PMC: 11631637. DOI: 10.1111/acer.15459.

Digital Interventions for Recreational Cannabis Use Among Young Adults: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Behavior Change Technique Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.

Cote J, Chicoine G, Vinette B, Auger P, Rouleau G, Fontaine G J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e55031.

PMID: 38630515 PMC: 11063887. DOI: 10.2196/55031.

Using mobile technology to influence alcohol-impaired driving risk perceptions and decisions.

Haney A, Warner O, McMullin S, Motschman C, Trull T, McCarthy D Psychol Addict Behav. 2023; 38(1):47-55.

PMID: 37141035 PMC: 10624646. DOI: 10.1037/adb0000929.

References

Parnes J, Smith J, Conner B . Reefer madness or much ado about nothing? Cannabis legalization outcomes among young adults in the United States. Int J Drug Policy. 2018; 56:116-120. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.03.011. View

Walton M, Bohnert K, Resko S, Barry K, Chermack S, Zucker R . Computer and therapist based brief interventions among cannabis-using adolescents presenting to primary care: one year outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013; 132(3):646-53. PMC: 3770780. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.04.020. View

Tanner-Smith E, Lipsey M . Brief alcohol interventions for adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014; 51:1-18. PMC: 4346408. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.09.001. View

Heron K, Romano K, Braitman A . Mobile technology use and mHealth text message preferences: an examination of gender, racial, and ethnic differences among emerging adult college students. Mhealth. 2019; 5:2. PMC: 6378243. DOI: 10.21037/mhealth.2019.01.01. View

Teeters J, Soltis K, Murphy J . A Mobile Phone-Based Brief Intervention With Personalized Feedback and Text Messaging Is Associated With Reductions in Driving After Drinking Among College Drinkers. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018; 79(5):710-719. PMC: 6240004. View

Kelly E, Darke S, Ross J . A review of drug use and driving: epidemiology, impairment, risk factors and risk perceptions. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2004; 23(3):319-44. DOI: 10.1080/09595230412331289482. View

DAmico E, Parast L, Shadel W, Meredith L, Seelam R, Stein B . Brief motivational interviewing intervention to reduce alcohol and marijuana use for at-risk adolescents in primary care. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018; 86(9):775-786. PMC: 6110093. DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000332. View

Cuttler C, Spradlin A . Measuring cannabis consumption: Psychometric properties of the Daily Sessions, Frequency, Age of Onset, and Quantity of Cannabis Use Inventory (DFAQ-CU). PLoS One. 2017; 12(5):e0178194. PMC: 5446174. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178194. View

Tanner-Smith E, Parr N, Schweer-Collins M, Saitz R . Effects of brief substance use interventions delivered in general medical settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2021; 117(4):877-889. PMC: 8904275. DOI: 10.1111/add.15674. View

10.

Hartman R, Huestis M . Cannabis effects on driving skills. Clin Chem. 2012; 59(3):478-92. PMC: 3836260. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.194381. View

11.

Foxcroft D, Coombes L, Wood S, Allen D, Almeida Santimano N, Moreira M . Motivational interviewing for the prevention of alcohol misuse in young adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 7:CD007025. PMC: 6457858. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007025.pub4. View

12.

Patrick M, Graupensperger S, Dworkin E, Duckworth J, Abdallah D, Lee C . Intoxicated driving and riding with impaired drivers: Comparing days with alcohol, marijuana, and simultaneous use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021; 225:108753. PMC: 8282726. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108753. View

13.

Brady J, Li G . Prevalence of alcohol and other drugs in fatally injured drivers. Addiction. 2012; 108(1):104-14. PMC: 3467360. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03993.x. View

14.

Reinhardt S, Bischof G, Grothues J, John U, Meyer C, Rumpf H . Gender differences in the efficacy of brief interventions with a stepped care approach in general practice patients with alcohol-related disorders. Alcohol Alcohol. 2008; 43(3):334-40. DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agn004. View

15.

Riper H, Hoogendoorn A, Cuijpers P, Karyotaki E, Boumparis N, Mira A . Effectiveness and treatment moderators of internet interventions for adult problem drinking: An individual patient data meta-analysis of 19 randomised controlled trials. PLoS Med. 2018; 15(12):e1002714. PMC: 6298657. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002714. View

16.

Sobell L, Brown J, Leo G, Sobell M . The reliability of the Alcohol Timeline Followback when administered by telephone and by computer. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1996; 42(1):49-54. DOI: 10.1016/0376-8716(96)01263-x. View

17.

Mason M, Ola B, Zaharakis N, Zhang J . Text messaging interventions for adolescent and young adult substance use: a meta-analysis. Prev Sci. 2014; 16(2):181-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-014-0498-7. View

18.

Lane T, Hall W . Traffic fatalities within US states that have legalized recreational cannabis sales and their neighbours. Addiction. 2019; 114(5):847-856. DOI: 10.1111/add.14536. View

19.

Li M, Brady J, DiMaggio C, Lusardi A, Tzong K, Li G . Marijuana use and motor vehicle crashes. Epidemiol Rev. 2011; 34:65-72. PMC: 3276316. DOI: 10.1093/epirev/mxr017. View

20.

Halladay J, Scherer J, MacKillop J, Woock R, Petker T, Linton V . Brief interventions for cannabis use in emerging adults: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and evidence map. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019; 204:107565. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107565. View