» Articles » PMID: 30842950

Mobile Technology Use and MHealth Text Message Preferences: an Examination of Gender, Racial, and Ethnic Differences Among Emerging Adult College Students

Overview
Journal Mhealth
Date 2019 Mar 8
PMID 30842950
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) interventions are a potentially feasible way of targeting emerging adult college students' physical and mental health concerns, decreasing health-risk, and augmenting health promoting behaviors. However, there is limited evidence attesting to advantageous ways of designing mHealth treatments in a manner that is apt to be well-received by emerging adult college students at large, and gender, racial, and ethnic subgroups in particular. To address these research gaps, this exploratory study examined general trends, and gender (male, female), racial (White, Black), and ethnic (Latino, non-Latino) differences, in emerging adult college students' mobile technology ownership and phone plan characteristics, technology use behaviors, and mHealth text message preferences.

Methods: Participants included 1,371 college students aged 18 to 25 (20.54±1.80) years. Between July 2015 and April 2016, students from three universities in the Mid-Atlantic United States completed an online survey assessing technology use. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were run to answer primary study questions.

Results: Results suggest that students frequently engage with mobile devices and inherent features. Overall, nearly all (99.5%) students owned smartphones, 89.5% had long-term phone contracts, 94.6% had unlimited texting, and 38.6% reported having unlimited data plans. Further, 96.8% reported texting, 92.0% accessing email, 97.3% accessing the internet, and 97.2% using apps on their mobile devices at least once per day. When asked about the types of text messages they would prefer to receive in the context of mHealth interventions, most students preferred messages that did not contain textese, were longer shorter, contained a single vs. multiple exclamation marks, had a smiley face emoticon, used capitalization for emphatic purposes, contained a statement a question, were polite in tone, and were non-directive. There was also multiple gender, racial, and ethnic group differences in mobile device ownership and plan attributes, usage patterns, and text message preferences.

Conclusions: The present research provides evidence that smartphones are commonly used by college students and may be a feasible platform for health intervention delivery among diverse student groups. mHealth interventions could use the present results to inform the design of future mHealth interventions and, in turn, increase the acceptability, usability, and efficacy of such treatments for college students at large and diverse student groups in particular.

Citing Articles

Development of a Culturally Appropriate Text Messaging Platform for Improving Breast Cancer Screening Uptake Among Ghanaian Women in Metropolitan Areas.

Sefenu R, Addo-Lartey A, Bonful H, Nwameme A, Abagre T, Awua A Int J Breast Cancer. 2024; 2024:5587515.

PMID: 39483925 PMC: 11527544. DOI: 10.1155/2024/5587515.


An intervention development study of an mHealth app to manage women's health and safety while on probation.

Crawford A, Salisbury E, McGrath J Health Justice. 2024; 12(1):22.

PMID: 38771509 PMC: 11106979. DOI: 10.1186/s40352-024-00277-6.


Characterizing perceived usability and its correlation with smoking cessation: An analysis of user assessments of the smoking cessation app quitSTART.

Chen Z, Siegel L, Prutzman Y, Wiseman K Internet Interv. 2024; 35:100714.

PMID: 38313141 PMC: 10835281. DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100714.


Adherence Promotion With Tailored Motivational Messages: Proof of Concept and Message Preferences in Older Adults.

Zhang S, Dieciuc M, Dilanchian A, Lustria M, Carr D, Charness N Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2024; 10:23337214231224571.

PMID: 38223550 PMC: 10785722. DOI: 10.1177/23337214231224571.


Investigating the Role of Context in the Delivery of Text Messages for Supporting Psychological Wellbeing.

Bhattacharjee A, Williams J, Meyerhoff J, Kumar H, Mariakakis A, Kornfield R Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2023; 2023.

PMID: 37223844 PMC: 10201989. DOI: 10.1145/3544548.3580774.


References
1.
Riley W, Obermayer J, Jean-Mary J . Internet and mobile phone text messaging intervention for college smokers. J Am Coll Health. 2008; 57(2):245-8. DOI: 10.3200/JACH.57.2.245-248. View

2.
Heron K, Smyth J . Ecological momentary interventions: incorporating mobile technology into psychosocial and health behaviour treatments. Br J Health Psychol. 2009; 15(Pt 1):1-39. PMC: 2800172. DOI: 10.1348/135910709X466063. View

3.
Ahlers-Schmidt C, Hart T, Chesser A, Paschal A, Nguyen T, Wittler R . Content of text messaging immunization reminders: what low-income parents want to know. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 85(1):119-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.08.007. View

4.
Junco R, Merson D, Salter D . The effect of gender, ethnicity, and income on college students' use of communication technologies. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2010; 13(6):619-27. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0357. View

5.
Woolford S, Barr K, Derry H, Jepson C, Clark S, Strecher V . OMG do not say LOL: obese adolescents' perspectives on the content of text messages to enhance weight loss efforts. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011; 19(12):2382-7. PMC: 3226837. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2011.266. View