» Articles » PMID: 35987671

The SMILe Integrated Care Model in Allogeneic SteM Cell TransplantatIon FaciLitated by EHealth: a Protocol for a Hybrid Effectiveness-implementation Randomised Controlled Trial

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2022 Aug 20
PMID 35987671
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: While effectiveness outcomes of eHealth-facilitated integrated care models (eICMs) in transplant and oncological populations are promising, implementing and sustaining them in real-world settings remain challenging. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) patients could benefit from an eICM to enhance health outcomes. To combat health deterioration, integrating chronic illness management, including continuous symptom and health behaviour monitoring, can shorten reaction times. We will test the 1st-year post-alloSCT effectiveness and evaluate bundled implementation strategies to support the implementation of a newly developed and adapted eICM in allogeneic stem cell transplantation facilitated by eHealth (SMILe-ICM). SMILe-ICM has been designed by combining implementation, behavioural, and computer science methods. Adaptions were guided by FRAME and FRAME-IS. It consists of four modules: 1) monitoring & follow-up; 2) infection prevention; 3) physical activity; and 4) medication adherence, delivered via eHealth and a care coordinator (an Advanced Practice Nurse). The implementation was supported by contextually adapted implementation strategies (e.g., creating new clinical teams, informing local opinion leaders).

Methods: Using a hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomised controlled trial, we will include a consecutive sample of 80 adult alloSCT patients who were transplanted and followed by University Hospital Basel (Switzerland). Inclusion criteria are basic German proficiency; elementary computer literacy; internet access; and written informed consent. Patients will be excluded if their condition prevents the use of technology, or if they are followed up only at external centres. Patient-level (1:1) stratified randomisation into a usual care group and a SMILe-ICM group will take place 10 days pre-transplantation. To gauge the SMILe-ICM's effectiveness primary outcome (re-hospitalisation rate), secondary outcomes (healthcare utilization costs; length of inpatient re-hospitalizations, medication adherence; treatment and self-management burden; HRQoL; Graft-versus-Host Disease rate; survival; overall survival rate) and implementation outcomes (acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity), we will use multi-method, multi-informant assessment (via questionnaires, interviews, electronic health record data, cost capture methods).

Discussion: The SMILe-ICM has major innovative potential for reengineering alloSCT follow-up care, particularly regarding short- and medium-term outcomes. Our dual focus on implementation and effectiveness will both inform optimization of the SMILe-ICM and provide insights regarding implementation strategies and pathway, understudied in eHealth-facilitated ICMs in chronically ill populations.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT04789863 . Registered April 01, 2021.

Citing Articles

Trust in the Transplant Team Associated With the Level of Chronic Illness Management-A Secondary Data Analysis of the International BRIGHT Study.

Mielke J, Cajita M, Denhaerynck K, Valenta S, Dobbels F, Russell C Transpl Int. 2024; 37:11704.

PMID: 38529215 PMC: 10961910. DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.11704.


An assessment of adaptation and fidelity in the implementation of an audit and feedback-based intervention to improve transition to adult type 1 diabetes care in Ontario, Canada.

Ahmad S, Ivers N, Zenlea I, Parsons J, Shah B, Mukerji G Implement Sci Commun. 2024; 5(1):25.

PMID: 38500183 PMC: 10946155. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00563-2.


Telemedicine in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Therapy.

Gandhi A, Lee C Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(16).

PMID: 37627136 PMC: 10452361. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164108.


Characterizing provider-led adaptations to mobile phone delivery of the Adolescent Transition Package (ATP) in Kenya using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS): a mixed....

Mangale D, Onyango A, Mugo C, Mburu C, Chhun N, Wamalwa D Implement Sci Commun. 2023; 4(1):95.

PMID: 37580836 PMC: 10424422. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00446-y.


Medication Adherence among Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review.

Visintini C, Mansutti I, Palese A Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(9).

PMID: 37173924 PMC: 10177142. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092452.


References
1.
Waltz T, Powell B, Chinman M, Smith J, Matthieu M, Proctor E . Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC): protocol for a mixed methods study. Implement Sci. 2014; 9:39. PMC: 3987065. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-39. View

2.
Simblett S, Greer B, Matcham F, Curtis H, Polhemus A, Ferrao J . Barriers to and Facilitators of Engagement With Remote Measurement Technology for Managing Health: Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Findings. J Med Internet Res. 2018; 20(7):e10480. PMC: 6062692. DOI: 10.2196/10480. View

3.
Duettmann W, Naik M, Zukunft B, Osmonodja B, Bachmann F, Choi M . eHealth in transplantation. Transpl Int. 2020; 34(1):16-26. DOI: 10.1111/tri.13778. View

4.
Tang J, James L, Howell M, Tong A, Wong G . eHealth Interventions for Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Transplantation. 2020; 104(8):e224-e235. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003294. View

5.
McKenna D, Sullivan M, Hill J, Lowrey C, Brown J, Hickman J . Hospital readmission following transplantation: identifying risk factors and designing preventive measures. J Community Support Oncol. 2016; 13(9):316-22. DOI: 10.12788/jcso.0168. View