» Articles » PMID: 36183141

Unraveling Implementation Context: the Basel Approach for CoNtextual ANAlysis (BANANA) in Implementation Science and Its Application in the SMILe Project

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2022 Oct 1
PMID 36183141
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Designing intervention and implementation strategies with careful consideration of context is essential for successful implementation science projects. Although the importance of context has been emphasized and methodology for its analysis is emerging, researchers have little guidance on how to plan, perform, and report contextual analysis. Therefore, our aim was to describe the Basel Approach for coNtextual ANAlysis (BANANA) and to demonstrate its application on an ongoing multi-site, multiphase implementation science project to develop/adapt, implement, and evaluate an integrated care model in allogeneic SteM cell transplantatIon facILitated by eHealth (the SMILe project).

Methods: BANANA builds on guidance for assessing context by Stange and Glasgow (Contextual factors: the importance of considering and reporting on context in research on the patient-centered medical home, 2013). Based on a literature review, BANANA was developed in ten discussion sessions with implementation science experts and a medical anthropologist to guide the SMILe project's contextual analysis. BANANA's theoretical basis is the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework. Working from an ecological perspective, CICI acknowledges contextual dynamics and distinguishes between context and setting (the implementation's physical location).

Results: BANANA entails six components: (1) choose a theory, model, or framework (TMF) to guide the contextual analysis; (2) use empirical evidence derived from primary and/or secondary data to identify relevant contextual factors; (3) involve stakeholders throughout contextual analysis; (4) choose a study design to assess context; (5) determine contextual factors' relevance to implementation strategies/outcomes and intervention co-design; and (6) report findings of contextual analysis following appropriate reporting guidelines. Partly run simultaneously, the first three components form a basis both for the identification of relevant contextual factors and for the next components of the BANANA approach.

Discussion: Understanding of context is indispensable for a successful implementation science project. BANANA provides much-needed methodological guidance for contextual analysis. In subsequent phases, it helps researchers apply the results to intervention development/adaption and choices of contextually tailored implementation strategies. For future implementation science projects, BANANA's principles will guide researchers first to gather relevant information on their target context, then to inform all subsequent phases of their implementation science project to strengthen every part of their work and fulfill their implementation goals.

Citing Articles

Strategies to Assess Risk for Hereditary Cancer in Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Swisher E, Harris H, Knerr S, Theoryn T, Norquist B, Brant J JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(3):e250185.

PMID: 40053353 PMC: 11889468. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0185.


Context makes a difference: a qualitative study exploring how to implement a multifactorial falls prevention intervention in the community.

Vandervelde S, de Casterle B, Vlaeyen E, Flamaing J, Valy S, Belaen G BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):485.

PMID: 39910393 PMC: 11800634. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21561-6.


Characteristics of Quality Improvement Projects in Health Services: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Khalil H, de Moel-Mandel C, Verma D, Kynoch K, Fernandez R, Ramis M J Evid Based Med. 2025; 18(1):e12670.

PMID: 39838939 PMC: 11822086. DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12670.


Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions tool in Dutch primary care: a context analysis.

Claessens D, Boudewijns E, Vervloet M, Keijsers L, Gidding-Slok A, van Schayck O BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e087197.

PMID: 39833000 PMC: 11751986. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087197.


Creating a sense of place when implementing a new emergency department in Denmark: a qualitative study.

Kirk J, Nilsen P, Andersen O, Stefansdottir N, Lindstrom M, Powell B BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1482.

PMID: 39604991 PMC: 11600571. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11980-3.


References
1.
Ribaut J, Leppla L, Teynor A, Valenta S, Dobbels F, Zullig L . Theory-driven development of a medication adherence intervention delivered by eHealth and transplant team in allogeneic stem cell transplantation: the SMILe implementation science project. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020; 20(1):827. PMC: 7465386. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05636-1. View

2.
Allen J, Towne Jr S, Maxwell A, DiMartino L, Leyva B, Bowen D . Meausures of organizational characteristics associated with adoption and/or implementation of innovations: A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; 17(1):591. PMC: 5569532. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2459-x. View

3.
Minogue V, Matvienko-Sikar K, Hayes C, Morrissey M, Gorman G, Terres A . The usability and applicability of knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks for research in the context of a national health service. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021; 19(1):105. PMC: 8314482. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-021-00747-5. View

4.
McHugh S, Dorsey C, Mettert K, Purtle J, Bruns E, Lewis C . Measures of outer setting constructs for implementation research: A systematic review and analysis of psychometric quality. Implement Res Pract. 2023; 1:2633489520940022. PMC: 9924255. DOI: 10.1177/2633489520940022. View

5.
Birken S, Rohweder C, Powell B, Shea C, Scott J, Leeman J . T-CaST: an implementation theory comparison and selection tool. Implement Sci. 2018; 13(1):143. PMC: 6251099. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0836-4. View