» Articles » PMID: 35983605

Norm Values of Muscular Strength Across the Life Span in a Healthy Swiss Population: The COmPLETE Study

Overview
Journal Sports Health
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2022 Aug 19
PMID 35983605
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Grip strength is used to estimate whole-body strength for health surveillance purposes. Explosive strength is considered important, yet economic measures able to detect early deterioration of neuromuscular capabilities are lacking. Whether handgrip maximum rate of force development (GRFD) or whole-body strength tests are better predictors of lower body power than handgrip maximum strength (GF) and their trajectories throughout the life span are unknown.

Hypothesis: GRFD should be more closely related to lower body power than GF, and its trajectories over the life span should more closely follow that of lower body power.

Study Design: Cross-sectional.

Level Of Evidence: Level 2b.

Methods: A total of 613 healthy participants aged 20 to 91 years were tested for countermovement jump peak power, GF, handgrip rate of force development, and midthigh pull peak force (MTP). Cubic splines and linear models were built for age trajectories, generalized additive models for quintile curves, and linear regression was used to assess predictive quality.

Results: Peak power (P) declined linearly to 60% of young adult level, with GRFD, GF, and MTP remaining stable up to age 50 years and then declining more sharply to 52% to 71% of young adult levels. Trajectories were similar for male and female participants. GRFD (β = 0.17) and MTP (β = 0.08) were worse predictors of P than GF (β = 0.24) in models adjusted for age, sex, lean body mass, and vigorous physical activity levels.

Conclusion: GRFD was not superior to maximum strength in predicting lower body power. For health surveillance purposes, it therefore appears that GF tests are more economical and equally good predictors of lower body explosive strength at older age. The data provided can be used as norm values for healthy subjects.

Clinical Relevance: Incorporating countermovement jump testing for early detection of declines in explosive capabilities might be advised.

Citing Articles

Relative and absolute intensity accelerometer metrics decipher the effects of age, sex, and occupation on physical activity.

Fabian S, Schwendinger F, Raphael K, Knaier R, Jonathan W, Wagner J BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):885.

PMID: 40050804 PMC: 11884089. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21800-w.


Effects of a Yoga Program Combined with a Mediterranean Diet on Nutritional Status and Functional Capacity in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Carcelen-Fraile M, Martin-Baute M, Ledesma-Cerrato M, Castellote-Caballero Y, Gonzalez-Martin A, Hita-Contreras F Nutrients. 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 38892534 PMC: 11175083. DOI: 10.3390/nu16111601.


Agility training to integratively promote neuromuscular, cardiorespiratory and cognitive function in healthy older adults: a one-year randomized-controlled trial.

Lichtenstein E, Held S, Rappelt L, Zacher J, Eibl A, Ludyga S Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2023; 20(1):21.

PMID: 37951885 PMC: 10638759. DOI: 10.1186/s11556-023-00331-6.


Accelerometer Metrics: Healthy Adult Reference Values, Associations with Cardiorespiratory Fitness, and Clinical Implications.

Schwendinger F, Wagner J, Knaier R, Infanger D, Rowlands A, Hinrichs T Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2023; 56(2):170-180.

PMID: 37703330 PMC: 11882184. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003299.

References
1.
Maden-Wilkinson T, McPhee J, Jones D, Degens H . Age-Related Loss of Muscle Mass, Strength, and Power and Their Association With Mobility in Recreationally-Active Older Adults in the United Kingdom. J Aging Phys Act. 2014; 23(3):352-60. DOI: 10.1123/japa.2013-0219. View

2.
West D, Owen N, Jones M, Bracken R, Cook C, Cunningham D . Relationships between force-time characteristics of the isometric midthigh pull and dynamic performance in professional rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2011; 25(11):3070-5. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318212dcd5. View

3.
Abernethy P, Wilson G, Logan P . Strength and power assessment. Issues, controversies and challenges. Sports Med. 1995; 19(6):401-17. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-199519060-00004. View

4.
Konigstein K, Wagner J, Frei M, Knaier R, Klenk C, Carrard J . Endothelial function of healthy adults from 20 to 91 years of age: prediction of cardiovascular risk by vasoactive range. J Hypertens. 2021; 39(7):1361-1369. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002798. View

5.
Wang C, Chen L . Grip strength in older adults: test-retest reliability and cutoff for subjective weakness of using the hands in heavy tasks. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 91(11):1747-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.225. View