» Articles » PMID: 35974469

Assessing the Use of Environmental DNA (eDNA) As a Tool in the Detection of Human DNA in Water

Overview
Journal J Forensic Sci
Specialty Forensic Sciences
Date 2022 Aug 17
PMID 35974469
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) is a highly sensitive and cost-effective tool that is increasingly being applied to studies of biodiversity and species detection. This non-invasive method relies on the collection of environmental samples that contain genetic material being shed into surrounding environment by the target organism/s. While forensic science has a long history of using molecular tools for collecting DNA from the environment, the detection of human DNA from environmental water samples has been limited. This study investigated the detection and degradation rates of human eDNA in water samples under controlled laboratory conditions. Using a human-specific qPCR assay targeting the ND1 region of human mitochondrial DNA, eDNA degradation over time in water spiked with human blood was assessed. Recovery of nuclear DNA was investigated by determining if routine DNA short tandem repeat (STR) profiles of the blood source could be generated. Results demonstrated that human eDNA remains detectable for up to 11 days under laboratory conditions in environmental water and up to 35 days in distilled water. Partial STR profiles could be recovered from environmental water only up to 24 h, while, in distilled water, partial profiles continued to be recovered up to 840 h. These findings demonstrate that sampling human eDNA from aquatic samples can provide reliable human DNA detection within relatively short time windows, assisting law enforcement agencies by providing information about the potential time an individual may have been present in an area or assisting in the detection and location of a body or remains in aquatic environments.

Citing Articles

Inadvertent human genomic bycatch and intentional capture raise beneficial applications and ethical concerns with environmental DNA.

Whitmore L, McCauley M, Farrell J, Stammnitz M, Koda S, Mashkour N Nat Ecol Evol. 2023; 7(6):873-888.

PMID: 37188965 PMC: 10250199. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-023-02056-2.


Assessing the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) as a tool in the detection of human DNA in water.

Antony Dass M, Sherman C, Nai Y, Ellis M, van Oorschot R, Durdle A J Forensic Sci. 2022; 67(6):2299-2307.

PMID: 35974469 PMC: 9804157. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.15124.

References
1.
Bae S, Wuertz S . Rapid decay of host-specific fecal Bacteroidales cells in seawater as measured by quantitative PCR with propidium monoazide. Water Res. 2009; 43(19):4850-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.06.053. View

2.
Merkes C, McCalla S, Jensen N, Gaikowski M, Amberg J . Persistence of DNA in carcasses, slime and avian feces may affect interpretation of environmental DNA data. PLoS One. 2014; 9(11):e113346. PMC: 4234652. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113346. View

3.
Antony Dass M, Sherman C, Nai Y, Ellis M, van Oorschot R, Durdle A . Assessing the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) as a tool in the detection of human DNA in water. J Forensic Sci. 2022; 67(6):2299-2307. PMC: 9804157. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.15124. View

4.
Borin S, Crotti E, Mapelli F, Tamagnini I, Corselli C, Daffonchio D . DNA is preserved and maintains transforming potential after contact with brines of the deep anoxic hypersaline lakes of the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. Saline Syst. 2008; 4:10. PMC: 2531117. DOI: 10.1186/1746-1448-4-10. View

5.
van Oorschot R, Meakin G, Kokshoorn B, Goray M, Szkuta B . DNA Transfer in Forensic Science: Recent Progress towards Meeting Challenges. Genes (Basel). 2021; 12(11). PMC: 8618004. DOI: 10.3390/genes12111766. View