» Articles » PMID: 35972652

Effect of Obturation Technique on Penetration of Calcium Silicate-based Sealer into Dentinal Tubules After Endodontic Retreatment of Mandibular Premolars

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2022 Aug 16
PMID 35972652
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) was used to investigate the penetration of endodontic sealers into the dentinal tubules after retreatment using two different obturation techniques.

Materials And Methods: Thirty mandibular premolars were prepared up to instrument F3 (ProTaper Universal, Dentsply) and filled with Endofill using the single cone technique. The canals were retreated using Mtwo instruments. Reobturation was performed with the Bio-C sealer mixed with a fluorophore dye (Fluo-3) using either the lateral condensation technique (group LC) or the single cone technique (group SC) (n = 15). Teeth were sectioned 2, 4, and 6 mm from the apex and analyzed with CLSM to assess the penetration of the sealer into the canal perimeter and the maximum depth of penetration of the sealer into the dentinal tubules. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and the Student-t and Holm-Sidak tests.

Results: In the apical segment, the penetrated perimeter was significantly higher in the LC group than in the SC group (p < 0.05); no significant difference was found in the middle and cervical segments (p > 0.05). In terms of penetration depth, no significant differences were found for any of the segments studied (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The LC technique promoted a higher percentage of canal circumference penetrated by the sealer than the SC technique in the apical segment after endodontic retreatment.

Clinical Relevance: CLSM demonstrated that the LC technique promoted a higher percentage of canal perimeter penetrated by the Bio-C sealer than the SC technique in the apical segment of mandibular premolars after retreatment.

Citing Articles

Influence of bioceramic cones on the quality of root canal filling relative to bond strength and adaptation of the adhesive interface.

Quaresma S, Alves Dos Santos G, Silva-Sousa A, Camargo R, Silva-Sousa Y, Lopes-Olhe F Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 27(12):7919-7933.

PMID: 38032392 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05385-5.


Effect of continuous chelation on the dentinal tubule penetration of a calcium silicate-based root canal sealer: a confocal laser microscopy study.

Hassan R, Roshdy N BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):377.

PMID: 37296374 PMC: 10257323. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-02995-z.

References
1.
Rached-Junior F, Sousa-Neto M, Souza-Gabriel A, Duarte M, Silva-Sousa Y . Impact of remaining zinc oxide-eugenol-based sealer on the bond strength of a resinous sealer to dentine after root canal retreatment. Int Endod J. 2013; 47(5):463-9. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12170. View

2.
Martins M, Duarte M, Cavenago B, Kato A, Bueno C . Effectiveness of the ProTaper Next and Reciproc Systems in Removing Root Canal Filling Material with Sonic or Ultrasonic Irrigation: A Micro-computed Tomographic Study. J Endod. 2017; 43(3):467-471. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.040. View

3.
Bernardes R, Duarte M, Vivan R, Alcalde M, Vasconcelos B, Bramante C . Comparison of three retreatment techniques with ultrasonic activation in flattened canals using micro-computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy. Int Endod J. 2015; 49(9):890-897. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12522. View

4.
Zavattini A, Knight A, Foschi F, Mannocci F . Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Using a New Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Med. 2020; 9(3). PMC: 7141324. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9030782. View

5.
Graunaite I, Skucaite N, Lodiene G, Agentiene I, Machiulskiene V . Effect of Resin-based and Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers on Postoperative Pain: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial. J Endod. 2018; 44(5):689-693. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.010. View