» Articles » PMID: 35969712

Selection of Appropriate Biomatrices for Studies of Chronic Stress in Animals: a Review

Overview
Date 2022 Aug 15
PMID 35969712
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cortisol and corticosterone, hormones traditionally considered biomarkers of stress, can be measured in fluid biomatrices (e.g., blood, saliva) from live animals to evaluate conditions at sampling time, or in solid biomatrices (e.g., hair, feather) from live or dead animals to obtain information regarding long-term changes. Using these biomarkers to evaluate physiological stress responses in domestic animals may be challenging due to the diverse characteristics of biomatrices for potential measurement. Ideally, a single measurement from the biomatrix should be sufficient for evaluating chronic stress. The availability of appropriate and cost-effective immunoassay methods for detecting the biomarkers should also be considered. This review discusses the strengths and limitations of different biomatrices with regard to ensuring the highest possible reliability for chronic stress evaluation. Overall, solid biomatrices require less frequent sampling than other biomatrices, resulting in greater time- and cost-effectiveness, greater ease of use, and fewer errors. The multiplex immunoassay can be used to analyze interactions and correlations between cortisol and other stress biomarkers in the same biomatrix. In light of the lack of information regarding appropriate biomatrices for measuring chronic stress, this review may help investigators set experimental conditions or design biological research.

Citing Articles

Impact of environmental enrichment on growth, behavior, and welfare of weanling piglets from pre-weaning to 6 weeks of age.

Lee J, Oh S, Kim M J Anim Sci Technol. 2025; 67(1):152-163.

PMID: 39974793 PMC: 11833199. DOI: 10.5187/jast.2024.e1.


Hair cortisol of pigs in mixed organic farms: the influence of season, breeding system and sex.

Nadlucnik E, Vake T, Sket A, Zizek A, Snoj T, Stukelj M Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1491785.

PMID: 39735579 PMC: 11671477. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1491785.


Effect of a Broiler-Specific Light Spectrum on Growth Performance and Adrenocortical Activity in Chickens: A Pilot Study on a Commercial Farm.

Galosi L, Todini L, Menchetti L, Carbajal A, Palme R, Ruggiero N Vet Sci. 2024; 11(12).

PMID: 39728958 PMC: 11680236. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci11120618.


Effect of organic solvents on earwax cortisol extraction in Hanwoo cattle.

Ataallahi M, Park G, Park K J Anim Sci Technol. 2024; 66(6):1237-1245.

PMID: 39691619 PMC: 11647409. DOI: 10.5187/jast.2023.e117.


Assessment of Heat Processing Effects on Cortisol Concentration in Dairy Milk Products.

Ataallahi M, Park G, Nugrahaeningtyas E, Park K Food Sci Anim Resour. 2024; 44(6):1453-1461.

PMID: 39554820 PMC: 11564145. DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2024.e36.


References
1.
Azevedo A, Bailey L, Bandeira V, Dehnhard M, Fonseca C, de Sousa L . Age, sex and storage time influence hair cortisol levels in a wild mammal population. PLoS One. 2019; 14(8):e0221124. PMC: 6688795. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221124. View

2.
Chen Y, Arsenault R, Napper S, Griebel P . Models and Methods to Investigate Acute Stress Responses in Cattle. Animals (Basel). 2015; 5(4):1268-95. PMC: 4693215. DOI: 10.3390/ani5040411. View

3.
Fernandez-Novo A, Perez-Garnelo S, Villagra A, Perez-Villalobos N, Astiz S . The Effect of Stress on Reproduction and Reproductive Technologies in Beef Cattle-A Review. Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(11). PMC: 7697448. DOI: 10.3390/ani10112096. View

4.
Fourie N, Brown J, Jolly C, Phillips-Conroy J, Rogers J, Bernstein R . Sources of variation in hair cortisol in wild and captive non-human primates. Zoology (Jena). 2016; 119(2):119-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2016.01.001. View

5.
Higashi T, Yamagata K, Kato Y, Ogawa Y, Takano K, Nakaaze Y . Methods for determination of fingernail steroids by LC/MS/MS and differences in their contents between right and left hands. Steroids. 2016; 109:60-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2016.02.013. View