» Articles » PMID: 35966604

Mechanisms of the Oxygen Evolution Reaction on NiFeO and CoFeO Inverse-Spinel Oxides

Overview
Journal ACS Catal
Date 2022 Aug 15
PMID 35966604
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Spinel ferrites, especially Nickel ferrite, NiFeO, and Cobalt ferrite, CoFeO, are efficient and promising anode catalyst materials in the field of electrochemical water splitting. Using density functional theory, we extensively investigate and quantitatively model the mechanism and energetics of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) on the (001) facets of their inverse-spinel structure, thought as the most abundant orientations under reaction conditions. We catalogue a wide set of intermediates and mechanistic pathways, including the lattice oxygen mechanism (LOM) and adsorbate evolution mechanism (AEM), along with critical (rate-determining) O-O bond formation barriers and transition-state structures. In the case of NiFeO, we predict a Fe-site-assisted LOM pathway as the preferred OER mechanism, with a barrier (Δ ) of 0.84 eV at = 1.63 V versus SHE and a turnover frequency (TOF) of 0.26 s at 0.40 V overpotential. In the case of CoFeO, we find that a Fe-site-assisted LOM pathway (Δ = 0.79 eV at = 1.63 V SHE, TOF = 1.81 s at 0.40 V overpotential) and a Co-site-assisted AEM pathway (Δ = 0.79 eV at bias > = 1.34 V SHE, TOF = 1.81 s at bias >1.34 V) could both play a role, suggesting a coexistence of active sites, in keeping with experimental observations. The computationally predicted turnover frequencies exhibit a fair agreement with experimentally reported data and suggest CoFeO as a more promising OER catalyst than NiFeO in the pristine case, especially for the Co-site-assisted OER pathway, and may offer a basis for further progress and optimization.

Citing Articles

Electrocatalysis: From Planar Surfaces to Nanostructured Interfaces.

Fairhurst A, Snyder J, Wang C, Strmcnik D, Stamenkovic V Chem Rev. 2025; 125(3):1332-1419.

PMID: 39873431 PMC: 11826915. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00133.


Triggering Oxygen Redox Cycles in Nickel Ferrite by Octahedral Geometry Engineering for Enhancing Oxygen Evolution.

Peng Y, Zhao X, Shao Y, Yue X, Hu Z, Huang S Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 12(5):e2409024.

PMID: 39686629 PMC: 11792042. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202409024.


Importing Atomic Rare-Earth Sites to Activate Lattice Oxygen of Spinel Oxides for Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution.

Wang X, Hu J, Lu T, Wang H, Sun D, Tang Y Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2024; 64(3):e202415306.

PMID: 39380434 PMC: 11735878. DOI: 10.1002/anie.202415306.


One-Dimensional LaSrCuCoO Nanostructures for Efficient Oxygen Evolution Reaction.

Wu D, Chen Y, Bai Y, Zhu C, Zhang M Nanomaterials (Basel). 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38202520 PMC: 10781154. DOI: 10.3390/nano14010064.


Cyclohexane Oxidative Dehydrogenation on Graphene-Oxide-Supported Cobalt Ferrite Nanohybrids: Effect of Dynamic Nature of Active Sites on Reaction Selectivity.

Kadam S, Sandoval S, Bastl Z, Simkovicova K, Kvitek L, Jasik J ACS Catal. 2023; 13(20):13484-13505.

PMID: 37881789 PMC: 10594591. DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.3c02592.


References
1.
Hunter B, Winkler J, Gray H . Iron Is the Active Site in Nickel/Iron Water Oxidation Electrocatalysts. Molecules. 2018; 23(4). PMC: 6017163. DOI: 10.3390/molecules23040903. View

2.
Fujishima A, Honda K . Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature. 1972; 238(5358):37-8. DOI: 10.1038/238037a0. View

3.
Gong M, Li Y, Wang H, Liang Y, Wu J, Zhou J . An advanced Ni-Fe layered double hydroxide electrocatalyst for water oxidation. J Am Chem Soc. 2013; 135(23):8452-5. DOI: 10.1021/ja4027715. View

4.
Long X, Li J, Xiao S, Yan K, Wang Z, Chen H . A strongly coupled graphene and FeNi double hydroxide hybrid as an excellent electrocatalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2014; 53(29):7584-8. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201402822. View

5.
Danilovic N, Subbaraman R, Chang K, Chang S, Kang Y, Snyder J . Activity-Stability Trends for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction on Monometallic Oxides in Acidic Environments. J Phys Chem Lett. 2015; 5(14):2474-8. DOI: 10.1021/jz501061n. View