» Articles » PMID: 35966102

Interest of Bone Histomorphometry in Bone Pathophysiology Investigation: Foundation, Present, and Future

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2022 Aug 15
PMID 35966102
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite the development of non-invasive methods, bone histomorphometry remains the only method to analyze bone at the tissue and cell levels. Quantitative analysis of transiliac bone sections requires strict methodologic conditions but since its foundation more 60 years ago, this methodology has progressed. Our purpose was to review the evolution of bone histomorphometry over the years and its contribution to the knowledge of bone tissue metabolism under normal and pathological conditions and the understanding of the action mechanisms of therapeutic drugs in humans. The two main applications of bone histomorphometry are the diagnosis of bone diseases and research. It is warranted for the diagnosis of mineralization defects as in osteomalacia, of other causes of osteoporosis as bone mastocytosis, or the classification of renal osteodystrophy. Bone biopsies are required in clinical trials to evaluate the safety and mechanism of action of new therapeutic agents and were applied to anti-osteoporotic agents such as bisphosphonates and denosumab, an anti-RANKL, which induces a marked reduction of the bone turnover with a consequent elongation of the mineralization period. In contrast, an increased bone turnover with an extension of the formation site is observed with teriparatide. Romosozumab, an anti-sclerostin, has a dual effect with an early increased formation and reduced resorption. Bone histomorphometric studies allow us to understand the mechanism of coupling between formation and resorption and to evaluate the respective role of bone modeling and remodeling. The adaptation of new image analysis techniques will help bone biopsy analysis in the future.

Citing Articles

Histomorphometric Assessment of Non-Decalcified Plastic-Embedded Specimens for Evaluation of Bone Regeneration Using Bone Substitute Materials-A Systematic Review.

Rogova V, Peev S, Yotsova R, Gerova-Vatsova T, Parushev I Materials (Basel). 2025; 18(1.

PMID: 39795764 PMC: 11722015. DOI: 10.3390/ma18010119.


Osteoclast indices in osteogenesis imperfecta: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aksornthong S, Patel P, Komarova S JBMR Plus. 2024; 8(11):ziae112.

PMID: 39372603 PMC: 11450326. DOI: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae112.


Retrospective Characterization of Bone Histomorphometric Findings in Clinical Patient Specimens.

Sellman L, Tong X, Burton I, Kroger H J Bone Metab. 2024; 31(2):132-139.

PMID: 38886970 PMC: 11184156. DOI: 10.11005/jbm.2024.31.2.132.


Celebrating 50-years: the history and future of the International Society of Bone Morphometry.

Scheller E, McDonald M, Andersen T, Sumner D, Noda M, Erben R JBMR Plus. 2024; 8(7):ziae070.

PMID: 38868596 PMC: 11166892. DOI: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae070.


The relationship between bone strain index, bone mass, microarchitecture and mechanical behavior in human vertebrae: an ex vivo study.

Roux J, Duboeuf F, Sornay-Rendu E, Rinaudo L, Ulivieri F, Wegrzyn J Osteoporos Int. 2024; 35(6):1069-1075.

PMID: 38520505 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07066-9.


References
1.
Rehman M, Hoyland J, Denton J, Freemont A . Age related histomorphometric changes in bone in normal British men and women. J Clin Pathol. 1994; 47(6):529-34. PMC: 494743. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.47.6.529. View

2.
Sanchez-Molina D, Velazquez-Ameijide J, Quintana V, Arregui-Dalmases C, Crandall J, Subit D . Fractal dimension and mechanical properties of human cortical bone. Med Eng Phys. 2012; 35(5):576-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.06.024. View

3.
Dempster D, Zhou H, Recker R, Brown J, Recknor C, Lewiecki E . Remodeling- and Modeling-Based Bone Formation With Teriparatide Versus Denosumab: A Longitudinal Analysis From Baseline to 3 Months in the AVA Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2017; 33(2):298-306. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3309. View

4.
Bell G, Dunbar O, BECK J, Gibb A . Variations in strength of vertebrae with age and their relation to osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Res. 1967; 1(1):75-86. DOI: 10.1007/BF02008077. View

5.
Boivin G, Meunier P . Changes in bone remodeling rate influence the degree of mineralization of bone. Connect Tissue Res. 2002; 43(2-3):535-7. DOI: 10.1080/03008200290000934. View