Social Licence to Operate: What Can Equestrian Sports Learn from Other Industries?

Overview

Journal Animals (Basel)

Date 2022 Aug 12

PMID 35953977

Authors

Janet Douglas

Roly Owers

Madeleine L H Campbell

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The concept of 'social licence to operate' (SLO) is relevant to all animal-use activities. An SLO is an intangible, implicit agreement between the public and an industry/group. Its existence allows that industry/group to pursue its activities with minimal formalised restrictions because such activities have widespread societal approval. In contrast, the imposition of legal restrictions-or even an outright ban-reflect qualified or lack of public support for an activity. This review discusses current threats to equestrianism's SLO and suggests actions that those across the equine sector need to take to justify the continuation of the SLO. The most important of these is earning the trust of all stakeholders, including the public. Trust requires transparency of operations, establishment and communication of shared values, and demonstration of competence. These attributes can only be gained by taking an ethics-based, proactive, progressive, and holistic approach to the protection of equine welfare. Animal-use activities that have faced challenges to their SLO have achieved variable success in re-establishing the approval of society, and equestrianism can learn from the experience of these groups as it maps its future. The associated effort and cost should be regarded as an investment in the future of the sport.

Citing Articles

No More Evasion: Redefining Conflict Behaviour in Human-Horse Interactions.

OConnell E, Dyson S, McLean A, McGreevy P Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39943169 PMC: 11816191. DOI: 10.3390/ani15030399.

A wicked problem: Systemic issues surrounding Canadian equestrian dressage and dressage horse welfare.

Ross M, Proudfoot K, Merkies K, Lundgren C, Ritter C Anim Welf. 2025; 34:e11.

PMID: 39935780 PMC: 11810510. DOI: 10.1017/awf.2025.2.

Horses are worthy of care: Horse sector participants' attitudes towards animal sentience, welfare, and well-being.

Fiedler J, Ayre M, Rosanowski S, Slater J Anim Welf. 2025; 34:e6.

PMID: 39935777 PMC: 11811708. DOI: 10.1017/awf.2024.69.

The Role of European Equestrian Institutions in Training Professionals: Outcomes from a Workshop on Horse Welfare in Equestrian Education.

Torell Palmquist G, Kansala Alveheim N, Huot-Marchand F, Ashton L, Lewis V Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 39858183 PMC: 11758323. DOI: 10.3390/ani15020183.

Stakeholder Views on the Potential Benefits and Feasibility of an Equestrian Industry-Specific Health, Safety and Welfare Management System.

Chapman M, Fenner K, Thomas M, Thompson K Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(23).

PMID: 39682412 PMC: 11640081. DOI: 10.3390/ani14233450.

References

Darimont C, Hall H, Eckert L, Mihalik I, Artelle K, Treves A . Large carnivore hunting and the social license to hunt. Conserv Biol. 2020; 35(4):1111-1119. PMC: 8359201. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13657. View

Jones B, Goodfellow J, Yeates J, McGreevy P . A Critical Analysis of the British Horseracing Authority's Review of the Use of the Whip in Horseracing. Animals (Basel). 2015; 5(1):138-50. PMC: 4494335. DOI: 10.3390/ani5010138. View

Hausberger M, Lesimple C, Henry S . Detecting Welfare in a Non-Verbal Species: Social/Cultural Biases and Difficulties in Horse Welfare Assessment. Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(8). PMC: 8388525. DOI: 10.3390/ani11082249. View

Dyson S, Pollard D . Application of a Ridden Horse Pain Ethogram and Its Relationship with Gait in a Convenience Sample of 60 Riding Horses. Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(6). PMC: 7341225. DOI: 10.3390/ani10061044. View

Coleman G . Public animal welfare discussions and outlooks in Australia. Anim Front. 2020; 8(1):14-19. PMC: 6952000. DOI: 10.1093/af/vfx004. View

Butler D, Valenchon M, Annan R, Whay H, Mullan S . Stakeholder Perceptions of the Challenges to Racehorse Welfare. Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(6). PMC: 6616883. DOI: 10.3390/ani9060363. View

Mellor D, Beausoleil N, Littlewood K, McLean A, McGreevy P, Jones B . The 2020 Five Domains Model: Including Human-Animal Interactions in Assessments of Animal Welfare. Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(10). PMC: 7602120. DOI: 10.3390/ani10101870. View

Gray S, Sutterlin B, Siegrist M, Arvai J . The benefit of virtue signaling: Corporate sleight-of-hand positively influences consumers' judgments about "social license to operate". J Environ Manage. 2020; 260:110047. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110047. View

Furtado T, Preshaw L, Hockenhull J, Wathan J, Douglas J, Horseman S . How Happy Are Equine Athletes? Stakeholder Perceptions of Equine Welfare Issues Associated with Equestrian Sport. Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(11). PMC: 8614509. DOI: 10.3390/ani11113228. View

10.

Arnot C, Vizzier-Thaxton Y, Scanes C . Values, trust and science - building trust in today's food system in an era of radical transparency. Poult Sci. 2016; 95(9):2219-2224. DOI: 10.3382/ps/pew168. View

11.

Bergmann I . Naturalness and the Legitimacy of Thoroughbred Racing: A Photo-Elicitation Study with Industry and Animal Advocacy Informants. Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(9). PMC: 7552286. DOI: 10.3390/ani10091513. View

12.

Campbell M . An Ethical Framework for the Use of Horses in Competitive Sport: Theory and Function. Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(6). PMC: 8230307. DOI: 10.3390/ani11061725. View

13.

Hampton J, Jones B, McGreevy P . Social License and Animal Welfare: Developments from the Past Decade in Australia. Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(12). PMC: 7760378. DOI: 10.3390/ani10122237. View

14.

Laurence D . The devolution of the social licence to operate in the Australian mining industry. Extr Ind Soc. 2020; 8(2):100742. PMC: 7327457. DOI: 10.1016/j.exis.2020.05.021. View