» Articles » PMID: 33260531

Social License and Animal Welfare: Developments from the Past Decade in Australia

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2020 Dec 2
PMID 33260531
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

"Social license to operate" (SLO) refers to the implicit process by which a community gives an industry approval to conduct its current business activities. It has become an important focus for many natural resource management fields (especially mining), but there is less awareness of its role in animal use industries. This article describes how animal welfare has recently become arguably the most crucial consideration underpinning the SLO for Australian animal use industries. It describes several industries in Australia that have faced animal welfare scrutiny in the past decade (2010-2020) to illustrate how persistent issues can erode SLO, lead to regulatory bans, and decimate previously profitable industries. Industries described include the live export of livestock, greyhound and horse racing, kangaroo harvesting, and dairy and sheep farming. In these cases, there has been intense public discourse but little scholarly progress. This article examines factors that may have contributed to these developments and suggests approaches that may assist these industries in maintaining their SLO. Animal welfare has become a mainstream societal concern in Australia, and effective management of the community's expectations will be essential for the maintenance of SLO for many animal use industries.

Citing Articles

Brazilian livestock extensionists attitudes toward different fates for male dairy calves.

De-Sousa K, Benetton J, Pinheiro Machado Filho L, Hotzel M Front Vet Sci. 2025; 12:1448756.

PMID: 39958804 PMC: 11825792. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1448756.


An Investigation of Dairy Cattle Welfare in Commercial Iranian Farms: Results from Animal- and Stockperson-Based Measures.

Jafari-Gh A, Laven R, Khaloubagheri F, Mirrahimi M, Jafari-Gh S, Banadaky M Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39943129 PMC: 11815728. DOI: 10.3390/ani15030359.


Horses are worthy of care: Horse sector participants' attitudes towards animal sentience, welfare, and well-being.

Fiedler J, Ayre M, Rosanowski S, Slater J Anim Welf. 2025; 34:e6.

PMID: 39935777 PMC: 11811708. DOI: 10.1017/awf.2024.69.


An Update on Australian Policy around Lamb Marking with Examination of Potential Drivers. Comment on Johnston et al. How Well Does Australian Animal Welfare Policy Reflect Scientific Evidence: A Case Study Approach Based on Lamb Marking. 2023, ,....

Johnston C, Errington A, Hutchinson M, Whittaker A Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(19).

PMID: 39409839 PMC: 11475670. DOI: 10.3390/ani14192890.


Impact of a Local Government Funded Free Cat Sterilization Program for Owned and Semi-Owned Cats.

Cotterell J, Rand J, Barnes T, Scotney R Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 38891662 PMC: 11171210. DOI: 10.3390/ani14111615.


References
1.
Rice M, Hemsworth L, Hemsworth P, Coleman G . The Impact of a Negative Media Event on Public Attitudes Towards Animal Welfare in the Red Meat Industry. Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(4). PMC: 7222821. DOI: 10.3390/ani10040619. View

2.
Jones B, Goodfellow J, Yeates J, McGreevy P . A Critical Analysis of the British Horseracing Authority's Review of the Use of the Whip in Horseracing. Animals (Basel). 2015; 5(1):138-50. PMC: 4494335. DOI: 10.3390/ani5010138. View

3.
Sinclair M, Derkley T, Fryer C, Phillips C . Australian Public Opinions Regarding the Live Export Trade before and after an Animal Welfare Media Exposé. Animals (Basel). 2018; 8(7). PMC: 6070947. DOI: 10.3390/ani8070106. View

4.
Coleman G . Public animal welfare discussions and outlooks in Australia. Anim Front. 2020; 8(1):14-19. PMC: 6952000. DOI: 10.1093/af/vfx004. View

5.
Lee C, Fisher A . Welfare consequences of mulesing of sheep. Aust Vet J. 2007; 85(3):89-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2007.00114.x. View