» Articles » PMID: 35953500

Misinformation of COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccine Hesitancy

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Aug 11
PMID 35953500
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The current study examined various types of misinformation related to the COVID-19 vaccines and their relationships to vaccine hesitancy and refusal. Study 1 asked a sample of full-time working professionals in the US (n = 505) about possible misinformation they were exposed to related to the COVID-19 vaccines. Study 2 utilized an online survey to examine U.S. college students' (n = 441) knowledge about COVID-19 vaccines, and its associations with vaccine hesitancy and behavioral intention to get a COVID-19 vaccine. Analysis of open-ended responses in Study 1 revealed that 57.6% reported being exposed to conspiratorial misinformation such as COVID-19 vaccines are harmful and dangerous. The results of a structural equation modeling analysis for Study 2 supported our hypotheses predicting a negative association between the knowledge level and vaccine hesitancy and between vaccine hesitancy and behavioral intention. Vaccine hesitancy mediated the relationship between the vaccine knowledge and behavioral intention. Findings across these studies suggest exposure to misinformation and believing it as true could increase vaccine hesitancy and reduce behavioral intention to get vaccinated.

Citing Articles

Perceived benefits, information, vaccination history, and conspiracy beliefs as significant determinants of RSV vaccine acceptance among Arab seniors.

Sallam M, Al-Mahzoum K, Yousef Z, Alfouzan J, Alharbi M, Alsubaiei M Ther Adv Vaccines Immunother. 2025; 13:25151355251324384.

PMID: 40027198 PMC: 11869265. DOI: 10.1177/25151355251324384.


Difficulties faced by physicians from four European countries in rebutting antivaccination arguments: a cross-sectional study.

Holford D, Schmid P, Fasce A, Garrison A, Karlsson L, Taubert F BMJ Public Health. 2025; 2(1):e000195.

PMID: 40018236 PMC: 11812751. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000195.


Trust in official information as a key predictor of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance: evidence from a Czech longitudinal survey study.

Grygarova D, Kozeny J, Tisanska L, Havlik M, Horacek J BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):770.

PMID: 40001023 PMC: 11853922. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21988-x.


Socioeconomic status correlates with COVID-19 vaccination coverage among primary and secondary students in the most populated city of Chile.

Guerrero-Araya E, Ravello C, Rosemblatt M, Perez-Acle T Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1509.

PMID: 39789033 PMC: 11718089. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84260-z.


Vaccination Promotion Strategies in the Elderly: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Pereira A, Pinho C, Oliveira A, Santos R, Felgueiras M, Martins J Vaccines (Basel). 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39772056 PMC: 11728613. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12121395.


References
1.
Eysenbach G . Infodemiology and infoveillance: framework for an emerging set of public health informatics methods to analyze search, communication and publication behavior on the Internet. J Med Internet Res. 2009; 11(1):e11. PMC: 2762766. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1157. View

2.
Loomba S, de Figueiredo A, Piatek S, de Graaf K, Larson H . Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nat Hum Behav. 2021; 5(3):337-348. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1. View

3.
Bode L, Vraga E . See Something, Say Something: Correction of Global Health Misinformation on Social Media. Health Commun. 2017; 33(9):1131-1140. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1331312. View

4.
Latkin C, Dayton L, Yi G, Konstantopoulos A, Park J, Maulsby C . COVID-19 vaccine intentions in the United States, a social-ecological framework. Vaccine. 2021; 39(16):2288-2294. PMC: 7945864. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.02.058. View

5.
Hotez P . COVID19 meets the antivaccine movement. Microbes Infect. 2020; 22(4-5):162-164. PMC: 7235572. DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2020.05.010. View