» Articles » PMID: 29389158

The Psychological Roots of Anti-vaccination Attitudes: A 24-nation Investigation

Overview
Journal Health Psychol
Specialty Public Health
Date 2018 Feb 2
PMID 29389158
Citations 210
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Strengthening of antivaccination movements in recent decades has coincided with unprecedented increases in the incidence of some communicable diseases. Many intervention programs work from a deficit model of science communication, presuming that vaccination skeptics lack the ability to access or understand evidence. However, interventions focusing on evidence and the debunking of vaccine-related myths have proven to be either nonproductive or counterproductive. Working from a motivated reasoning perspective, we examine the psychological factors that might motivate people to reject scientific consensus around vaccination. To assist with international generalizability, we examine this question in 24 countries.

Methods: We sampled 5,323 participants in 24 countries, and measured their antivaccination attitudes. We also measured their belief in conspiracy theories, reactance (the tendency for people to have a low tolerance for impingements on their freedoms), disgust sensitivity toward blood and needles, and individualistic/hierarchical worldviews (i.e., people's beliefs about how much control society should have over individuals, and whether hierarchies are desirable).

Results: In order of magnitude, antivaccination attitudes were highest among those who (a) were high in conspiratorial thinking, (b) were high in reactance, (c) reported high levels of disgust toward blood and needles, and (d) had strong individualistic/hierarchical worldviews. In contrast, demographic variables (including education) accounted for nonsignificant or trivial levels of variance.

Conclusions: These data help identify the "attitude roots" that may motivate and sustain vaccine skepticism. In so doing, they help shed light on why repetition of evidence can be nonproductive, and suggest communication solutions to that problem. (PsycINFO Database Record

Citing Articles

Dual decision-making routes for COVID-19 and influenza vaccines uptake in parents: A mixed-methods study.

Yuan J, Dong M, Ip D, So H, Liao Q Br J Health Psychol. 2025; 30(2):e12789.

PMID: 40052507 PMC: 11887008. DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12789.


Videos engaging in conspiracy theories: Promoting or refuting foreign-pseudohistory on the video-sharing website (Bilibili).

Zhu Y, Wang Y, Ma S PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0318986.

PMID: 39964997 PMC: 11835251. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318986.


A randomized controlled trial of empathetic refutational learning with health care professionals.

Holford D, Maki K, Karlsson L, Lewandowsky S, Gould V, Soveri A BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):583.

PMID: 39939961 PMC: 11823235. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21787-4.


What made people (more) positive toward the COVID-19 vaccine? Exploring positive and negative deviance perspectives.

Matthijssen M, Cloin M, van Leeuwen F, van de Goor I, Achterberg P BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):441.

PMID: 39905331 PMC: 11792343. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-21027-1.


Understanding COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among the General Population in Japan from Public Health Ethical Perspectives: Findings from a Narrative Review.

Kuroda M, Ahmed M, Kuroda K, Lane S Asian Bioeth Rev. 2025; 17(1):141-165.

PMID: 39896082 PMC: 11785853. DOI: 10.1007/s41649-024-00310-8.