» Articles » PMID: 35948934

Public Sector Implementation Strategies to Approach the Judicialization of Health Care: a Systematic Review Protocol

Overview
Journal Syst Rev
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Aug 10
PMID 35948934
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The judicialization of health care can be understood as a societal response to pressing healthcare needs, which probably are not being adequately addressed by the current healthcare system. This phenomenon increases the strain on service resources, both in the health sector and in the judiciary system as well, demanding an institutional reorganization to manage judicial actions. It is believed that each institution has developed strategies for coping with the problem in isolation and with little public disclosure. The purpose of this review will be to identify institutional strategies implemented and to investigate their effects in approaching the judicialization of health care.

Methods: Electronic searches will be conducted up to December 2021 on 11 databases, supplemented with gray literature and references lists of secondary studies. The descriptor "judicialization of health" will be the basis for conducting the main research. Studies describing any strategy implemented by public institutions to approach the judicialization of health care will be included. Results related to the quality of services provided by the implemented strategy reported in the studies and those that report accessibility, usability, and potential adverse effects or harms caused by the implemented strategy will be investigated. In addition, it will be explored if there have been changes related to the value or characteristics of health litigation. Two reviewers will independently screen all citations, abstract data, and full-text papers. The risk of bias in each study will be appraised using a tool suggested by Cochrane Effective Practice and Care Organization Group (EPOC). Subsequently, the reviewers will also extract the data of interest and classify the findings of these studies according to their performance at the institutional level. The results obtained will be described as a narrative synthesis.

Discussion: This review may provide evidence on the effects of the strategies implemented to approach the judicialization of health care. It will potentially benefit health care and legal professionals, decision-makers, and researchers by identifying the types and characteristics of strategies that have the potential to improve service delivery in the future.

Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020160608.

Citing Articles

Public sector implementation strategies to approach the judicialization of health care: a systematic review protocol.

Yamauti S, Barreto J, Barberato-Filho S, da Silva Machado F, Lopes L Syst Rev. 2022; 11(1):164.

PMID: 35948934 PMC: 9364593. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-02043-x.

References
1.
Wildridge V, Bell L . How CLIP became ECLIPSE: a mnemonic to assist in searching for health policy/ management information. Health Info Libr J. 2002; 19(2):113-5. DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-1842.2002.00378.x. View

2.
Lavis J, Oxman A, Lewin S, Fretheim A . SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP). Health Res Policy Syst. 2009; 7 Suppl 1:I1. PMC: 3271819. DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-I1. View

3.
Biehl J, P Socal M, Amon J . The Judicialization of Health and the Quest for State Accountability: Evidence from 1,262 Lawsuits for Access to Medicines in Southern Brazil. Health Hum Rights. 2016; 18(1):209-220. PMC: 5070692. View

4.
Gomes F, Cherchiglia M, Machado C, Santos V, de Assis Acurcio F, Andrade E . [Access to medium and high-complexity procedures in the Brazilian Unified National Health System: a matter of judicialization]. Cad Saude Publica. 2014; 30(1):31-43. DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00176812. View

5.
Yamauti S, Barreto J, Barberato-Filho S, da Silva Machado F, Lopes L . Public sector implementation strategies to approach the judicialization of health care: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2022; 11(1):164. PMC: 9364593. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-02043-x. View