» Articles » PMID: 35945669

Subcellular Analysis of Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Redox Indices Differentiates Breast Cancer Cell Subtypes Better Than Nuclear-to-cytoplasmic Area Ratio

Overview
Journal J Biomed Opt
Date 2022 Aug 10
PMID 35945669
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Significance: Stratification of malignancy is valuable for cancer treatment. Both optical redox imaging (ORI) indices and nuclear-to-cytoplasmic volume/area ratio (N:C ratio) have been investigated to differentiate between cancers with varying aggressiveness, but these two methods have not been directly compared. The redox status in the cell nucleus has not been studied by ORI, and it remains unknown whether nuclear ORI indices add new biological information.

Aim: We sought to compare the capacity of whole-cell and subcellular ORI indices and N:C ratio to differentiate between breast cancer subtypes with varying aggressiveness and between mitotic and nonmitotic cells.

Approach: ORI indices for whole cell, cytoplasm, and nucleus as well as the N:C area ratio were generated for two triple-negative (more aggressive) and two receptor-positive (less aggressive) breast cancer cell lines by fluorescence microscopy.

Results: We found positive correlations between nuclear and cytoplasmic ORI indices within individual cells. On average, a nuclear redox status was found to be more oxidized than cytoplasm in triple-negative cells but not in receptor-positive cells. Whole-cell and subcellular ORI indices distinguished between the receptor statuses better than the N:C ratio. However, N:C ratio was a better differentiator between nonmitotic and mitotic triple-negative cells.

Conclusions: Subcellular ORI analysis differentiates breast cancer subtypes with varying aggressiveness better than N:C area ratio.

Citing Articles

Differential Mitochondrial Redox Responses to the Inhibition of NAD Salvage Pathway of Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells.

Kollmar J, Xu J, Gonzalves D, Baur J, Li L, Tchou J Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(1.

PMID: 39796638 PMC: 11718843. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17010007.


Multimodal Imaging Unveils the Impact of Nanotopography on Cellular Metabolic Activities.

Li Z, Sarikhani E, Prayotamornkul S, Meganathan D, Jahed Z, Shi L Chem Biomed Imaging. 2024; 2(12):825-834.

PMID: 39735831 PMC: 11672213. DOI: 10.1021/cbmi.4c00051.


Passage dependence of NADH redox status and reactive oxygen species level in triple-negative breast cancer cell lines with different invasiveness.

Podsednik A, Xu H, Li L Transl Breast Cancer Res. 2024; 5:27.

PMID: 39534579 PMC: 11557164. DOI: 10.21037/tbcr-24-36.


Use of Optical Redox Imaging to Quantify Alveolar Macrophage Redox State in Infants: Proof of Concept Experiments in a Murine Model and Human Tracheal Aspirates Samples.

Xu H, Gonzalves D, Hoffman J, Baur J, Li L, Jensen E Antioxidants (Basel). 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38790651 PMC: 11117937. DOI: 10.3390/antiox13050546.

References
1.
Varone A, Xylas J, Quinn K, Pouli D, Sridharan G, McLaughlin-Drubin M . Endogenous two-photon fluorescence imaging elucidates metabolic changes related to enhanced glycolysis and glutamine consumption in precancerous epithelial tissues. Cancer Res. 2014; 74(11):3067-75. PMC: 4837452. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2713. View

2.
Rehman A, Anwer A, Gosnell M, Mahbub S, Liu G, Goldys E . Fluorescence quenching of free and bound NADH in HeLa cells determined by hyperspectral imaging and unmixing of cell autofluorescence. Biomed Opt Express. 2017; 8(3):1488-1498. PMC: 5480559. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.8.001488. View

3.
Li L, Li W . Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human cancer: comprehensive reprogramming of metabolism, epigenetics, and differentiation. Pharmacol Ther. 2015; 150:33-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.01.004. View

4.
Heikal A . Intracellular coenzymes as natural biomarkers for metabolic activities and mitochondrial anomalies. Biomark Med. 2010; 4(2):241-63. PMC: 2905054. DOI: 10.2217/bmm.10.1. View

5.
Xu H, Feng M, Nath K, Nelson D, Roman J, Zhao H . Optical Redox Imaging of Lonidamine Treatment Response of Melanoma Cells and Xenografts. Mol Imaging Biol. 2018; 21(3):426-435. PMC: 6525077. DOI: 10.1007/s11307-018-1258-z. View