» Articles » PMID: 35939115

Improved Preoperative Risk Stratification in Endometrial Carcinoma Patients: External Validation of the ENDORISK Bayesian Network Model in a Large Population-based Case Series

Abstract

Purpose: Preoperative risk stratification of newly diagnosed endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients has been hindered by only moderate prediction performance for many years. Recently ENDORISK, a Bayesian network model, showed high predictive performance. It was the aim of this study to validate ENDORISK by applying the model to a population-based case series of EC patients.

Methods: ENDORISK was applied to a retrospective cohort of women surgically treated for EC from 2003 to 2013. Prediction accuracy for LNM as well as 5-year DSS was investigated. The model's overall performance was quantified by the Brier score, discriminative performance by area under the curve (AUC).

Results: A complete dataset was evaluable from 247 patients. 78.1% cases were endometrioid histotype. The majority of patients (n = 156;63.2%) had stage IA disease. Overall, positive lymph nodes were found in 20 (8.1%) patients. Using ENDORISK predicted probabilities, most (n = 156;63.2%) patients have been assigned to low or very low risk group with a false-negative rate of 0.6%. AUC for LNM prediction was 0.851 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.761-0.941] with a Brier score of 0.06. For 5-year DSS the AUC was 0.698 (95% CI 0.595-0.800) as Brier score has been calculated 0.09.

Conclusions: We were able to successfully validate ENDORISK for prediction of LNM and 5-year DSS. Next steps will now have to focus on ENDORISK performance in daily clinical practice. In addition, incorporating TCGA-derived molecular subtypes will be of key importance for future extended use. This study may support further promoting of data-based decision-making tools for personalized treatment of EC.

Citing Articles

Analysis of survival-related factors in patients with endometrial cancer using a Bayesian network model.

Zhang H, Zhao S, Lv P PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0314018.

PMID: 39570902 PMC: 11581279. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314018.


Letter to the Editor: Nodal infiltration in endometrial cancer: a prediction model using best subset regression.

Lombaers M, Haldorsen I, Reijnen C, Hommersom A, Pijnenborg J Eur Radiol. 2024; 34(12):7693-7695.

PMID: 38913245 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10860-y.


The value of machine learning in preoperative identification of lymph node metastasis status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ren Z, Chen B, Hong C, Yuan J, Deng J, Chen Y Front Oncol. 2024; 13:1289050.

PMID: 38173835 PMC: 10761539. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1289050.

References
1.
Talhouk A, McConechy M, Leung S, Yang W, Lum A, Senz J . Confirmation of ProMisE: A simple, genomics-based clinical classifier for endometrial cancer. Cancer. 2017; 123(5):802-813. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30496. View

2.
Morice P, Leary A, Creutzberg C, Abu-Rustum N, Darai E . Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2015; 387(10023):1094-1108. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00130-0. View

3.
Vitale S, Valenti G, Gulino F, Cignini P, Biondi A . Surgical treatment of high stage endometrial cancer: current perspectives. Updates Surg. 2016; 68(2):149-54. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-015-0340-1. View

4.
Clarke B, Gilks C . Endometrial carcinoma: controversies in histopathological assessment of grade and tumour cell type. J Clin Pathol. 2010; 63(5):410-5. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2009.071225. View

5.
Reijnen C, Gogou E, Visser N, Engerud H, Ramjith J, van der Putten L . Preoperative risk stratification in endometrial cancer (ENDORISK) by a Bayesian network model: A development and validation study. PLoS Med. 2020; 17(5):e1003111. PMC: 7228042. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003111. View