» Articles » PMID: 26826083

Surgical Treatment of High Stage Endometrial Cancer: Current Perspectives

Overview
Journal Updates Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2016 Jan 31
PMID 26826083
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Endometrial cancer is now the most common gynecologic malignancy. We investigate on new scientific evidences in endometrial cancer, particularly underlined updates in advanced endometrial cancer. Early stage endometrial cancer is the most frequent presentation; however, advanced endometrial cancer that occurs in 3-13 % of cases has bad prognosis. There are two types of endometrial cancer different in molecular pattern, therapeutic strategy and prognosis. Type I endometrial cancers develop in an environment of unopposed estrogen and often arise out of endometrial hyperplasia, characterized by mutations in the PTEN gene, K-ras, and microsatellite instability inception. Type II cancer is not an estrogen-related cancer, occurs predominantly in postmenopausal women, shows typical mutations in p53 and HER2/neu and has a poor prognosis. Preoperative characterization of the type's disease is an essential step for a right diagnosis and treatment. All patients should undergo to surgical staging, except those who are inoperable, according to FIGO recommendation. Surgical debulking, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking can be strategy options.

Citing Articles

Survival benefit of cytoreductive surgery in patients with primary stage IV endometrial cancer: a systematic review & meta-analysis.

Pham E, Horeweg N, van der Marel J, Nooij L BJC Rep. 2024; 2(1):76.

PMID: 39516418 PMC: 11523991. DOI: 10.1038/s44276-024-00084-4.


is a novel prognostic biomarker in endometrial cancer and is associated with immune infiltration.

Liang C, Chen Y, Chen S, She J, Shi Q, Wang P Transl Cancer Res. 2024; 12(12):3641-3652.

PMID: 38192989 PMC: 10774036. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-23-697.


JGOG2046: a feasibility study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by debulking surgery for clinically diagnosed FIGO stage IVb endometrial cancer.

Nakanishi T, Saito T, Aoki D, Watanabe Y, Ushijima K, Takano M Int J Clin Oncol. 2023; 28(3):436-444.

PMID: 36729215 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-022-02284-9.


Effects of RFRP‑3 on an ovariectomized estrogen‑primed rat model and HEC‑1A human endometrial carcinoma cells.

Zhao X, Si L, Niu L, Wei M, Wang F, Liu X Exp Ther Med. 2023; 25(2):76.

PMID: 36684658 PMC: 9842939. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2022.11775.


Improved preoperative risk stratification in endometrial carcinoma patients: external validation of the ENDORISK Bayesian network model in a large population-based case series.

Grube M, Reijnen C, Lucas P, Kommoss F, Kommoss F, Brucker S J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022; 149(7):3361-3369.

PMID: 35939115 PMC: 10314833. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04218-4.


References
1.
Lambrou N, Gomez-Marin O, Mirhashemi R, Beach H, Salom E, Almeida-Parra Z . Optimal surgical cytoreduction in patients with Stage III and Stage IV endometrial carcinoma: a study of morbidity and survival. Gynecol Oncol. 2004; 93(3):653-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.03.015. View

2.
Whitney C, Brunetto V, Zaino R, Lentz S, Sorosky J, Armstrong D . Phase II study of medroxyprogesterone acetate plus tamoxifen in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2004; 92(1):4-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.09.018. View

3.
Ivanova T, Krikunova L, Ryabchenko N, Mkrtchyan L, Khorokhorina V, Salnikova L . Association of the apolipoprotein E 2 allele with concurrent occurrence of endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2015; 2015:593658. PMC: 4337044. DOI: 10.1155/2015/593658. View

4.
Bristow R, Zerbe M, Rosenshein N, Grumbine F, Montz F . Stage IVB endometrial carcinoma: the role of cytoreductive surgery and determinants of survival. Gynecol Oncol. 2000; 78(2):85-91. DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5843. View

5.
Ueda S, Kapp D, Cheung M, Shin J, Osann K, Husain A . Trends in demographic and clinical characteristics in women diagnosed with corpus cancer and their potential impact on the increasing number of deaths. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198(2):218.e1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.075. View